A take on ChuckWoww's "Valentine's day"

By : Icarus
Views : 293

"You had sex and perhaps love again but Duan was distracted. You both were"

The drop dead memorable, lock stock and barrel, opening line to ChuckWoww’s ‘Valentine’s Day’ (http://www.thailandstories.com/article/non-fiction/valentine-s-day.html). The author is around on the net (fortunately), one book already published and yet he deprecatingly eludes.

Economical writing and patina though every word seems to be about something deeper, he alludes.

‘Especially when her expensive new cell phone started beeping. You had noticed it earlier. A gift from a friend she said. She held it to her ear. Said nothing.’

This beginning of the piece is buttressed by vital short sentences and the barely stated doubts that will engineer the narrative.

Overall his writing bothers me in way that I mostly like and confess seduction by the craft.

“Next morning early she began packing a bag. ‘Go stay sister,’ she said”.

The new phone on which she didn’t speak, spoke so we are not surprised by her imminent departure. Thus one thing really does follow from another here.

Years ago when first reading Ulysses I found myself too often lost in reverie, as though the pages crept in under my ribs. It was a long time until I understood myself to have inherited a rhetorical foundation which coincided so closely with Joyce’s as to preclude any easy reading gratification. Aristotle’s suspension of disbelief rendered not so much an effort or a result of elegant writerly artifice, rather a necessity for a certain and common kind of prose appreciation. Simply there was not enough light and dark for articulate comprehension.

Analogously the near perfect sequencing evident in ‘Valentine’s day’, puzzle-pieces placed snug-fitting one after another gestate distraction and blindside how good the writing really is.

“The walls seem to be made of cardboard. On the fourth day you meet her friend/sister/cousin Nok on the stairs. She seems surprised to see you in the building. She smiles. Don’t they all?

Beset by the elasticity of identity and the Thai manipulation of relative verity. Yim Siam.

“‘Duan very lucky na.’ Says Nok. ‘Go Samui.’

“What? Stunned you grope your way out onto the street where nothing makes sense and people have been transformed into ugly blobs of uncaring protoplasm.”

The axle and nascent Pattaya flyer.

Wandering around a Bangkok shopping mall "You catch a glimpse of a haggard, manic looking farang in a shop window. "

"Poor devil, you think. That bloke needs to get a grip. You offer to buy him a drink but he looks at you as if you’re mad and dissolves into the crowd of busy shoppers."

“Now what?”

“See if you can come up with a happy ending.”

Crises of closure occur elsewhere in his writing too; a post post-modern vertigo.

 

 

© Icarus. All rights reserved by the author.


Like this story? Share it with others: Stumble It! Add to Yahoo! My Web Bookmark to Del.icio.us Bookmark to Furl Spurl This! Add to Reddit Bookmark to Newsvine


Related Articles

» Falangland
» No Further Action
» Therapy
» Gestation Myth
» Vit's Escape
» Min's story.. part 1
» Min's story..final
» The Picture
» A Stone's Throw in Nong Khai
» Minor Fugue
» Festival notes
» Slight desserts
» The door in the floor
» Some days of Mercedes' autumn
» Sketch for a sexpat
» Occam's Razor
» An Inopportune Love
» Mawkish Concern
» Virgin

Rating

Teen



Comments / Feedback

Dana
July 8, 2008, 10:06

I had to fall in love with ChuckWoww through the back door. My first contact with his writing was with his book. Not a love affair. Later, on the net, he finally seduced me with short evocative man centered stories. Now I owe his book a second chance. It is on my life list.

His writing is also a good example for Writing 101 students of what constitutes a style. A few sentences and you know who is in your mind and it is a good thing.

I can't really get him to correspond with me about writing but I am finding out that is common. Either it is me or many writers are not chatty types; preferring to wrestle with the Devil one word at a time in the blissful isolations of memory and dream.

In my opinion ChuckWoww is an excellent example of the fact that there are thousands (millions) of skillful writers that no one will ever hear about while the publishing houses keep on killing trees for the pulp and crap served up to us in bookstores. How many times in a bookstore have I turned the pages back to the frontspiece and said "Who published this junk, and why?" More and more I live in a world I do not understand; either wisdom or senility sneaking up on me.

And finally: Icarus was chosen to review ChuckWoww? Reminds me of the pregnant woman who wants pickles and ice cream. Not a combination that obviously comes to mind. Worked for me.
chuckwoww
July 8, 2008, 12:34

Wow…a perceptive review from Icarus and some compliments from Dana! I don’t know what to say. Thank you, thank you gentlemen. Looks like all the years of lonely artistic suffering are finally starting to pay off!

I can’t talk about writing Dana. It’s such a strange thing. You start with a line or two, a location, some dialogue, fact and fiction get blurred, a story takes form. All I know is when it’s going well it’s wonderful…like surfing a big wave. But you know that.
korski
July 8, 2008, 12:37

Didn't work for me. Pretentious nonsense.
chuckwoww
July 8, 2008, 20:20

Those are quite serious charges Mr. Korski. I’m not sure how to respond …what is pretentious nonsense? Icarus’ review, Dana’s comments or my original submission? We’re just having a bit of fun here you know…care to elaborate?
Bill Bobby
July 9, 2008, 20:18

There are loads of brilliant writers submitting their work to this site now and for what it’s worth in my humble opinion Mr Chuckwoww is up there amongst the best.

Unfortunately my reading and writing time has taken a bit of a back seat of late, but I do always try to make an extra special effort to log on and see if the ‘wow factor’ has posted up anything new. Always look forward to reading you mate.

'Pretentious nonsense.'

Chuck, I’m not sure if Korski is directing his comment at an unwarranted, over exaggerated review of you, or the pretentious language that Icarus often uses in his ostentatious way of trying to impress others.

I have to say, these days I don’t choose to read Icarus, usually as I have found them in the past to be so mind-numbingly boring, but more over trying to define every other word he writes has proved to be too tiresome, too time consuming and if I’m honest in the end has just given me a headache.

But that’s just me, and then what do I know? After all, everybody else seems to down the back of Icarus’ pants every time he posts something up.

Anyway, for once I’m in agreement with Icarus, keep those stories coming Chuck.
chuckwoww
July 10, 2008, 22:00

Thank you Bill Bobby for the kind words. I feel better already. That was quite a shock I can tell you having my work branded pretentious nonsense. Really set me back. Especially coming from a writer of Mr. Korski’s caliber.

Of course I have no illusions about my own toehold on the literary ladder. Maybe I do get a little ‘literary’ sometimes but I try to keep it tongue-in-cheek. ‘Valentines Day’ was just a piece of experimental fiction I wrote for my own amusement. Nothing earth shattering. People can please themselves what they think. But it seems to have displeased Mr. Korski and I’m wondering why. No explanation has been offered. Who is being pretentious? What doesn’t make sense? Why should it make sense? Why is Mr. Korski so grumpy? Are his own outstanding contributions not receiving the attention they deserve? Is the Hollywood offer slow in coming? Am I perchance (pretentious variation on perhaps) caught up in some kind of personal vendetta between him and Icarus? I will resist the temptation to retaliate by saying something nasty about Mr. K’s latest ‘Chinaman’s Head’ story because I couldn’t make head nor tail of it, very muddled piece of writing I thought.
Marc Holt
July 11, 2008, 06:37

I have liked Chuckwoww for a long time. His stories are always a joy to read. Pretentious? I don't think so. However, if Korski is referring to Icarus' review I would have to agree with Bill Bobby. Like him, I don't bother reading Icarus' efforts any more. Icarus uses long pretentious words when a short one would do. His reasoning is too convoluted. I get the feeling he is trying to show off his "Classical education" to impress. Whereas the prime directive of any good writer should be to write for the reader clearly, concisely, using language that even a simpleton can understand and yet grip even the most discerning. Icarus fails on all these counts.

Can Icarus change style and write for us less lofty readers? Now that would be an interesting challenge wouldn't it? He definitely has it in him. But can he get it out?
korski
July 11, 2008, 08:41

Chuckwoww: Don't take offense. My comments, terse as they were, were directed at Icarus. Marc Holt and I are on about the same page here with regard to what he writes.
chuckwoww
July 11, 2008, 10:51

I was just happy Icarus felt like writing something in his own inimitable way. Anyway thank you for clearing that up finally Mr. Korski. I haven't been sleeping well lately.
RSS 2.0: Syndicate this article

Add Comment
* Name


Site



*Image Validation (?)


*Comments / Feedback





Print Article Print Article
Send to a friend Send to a friend
Save as PDF Save as PDF
Rate this Article :

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10
Poor Excellent