Women's liberation? I don't think so

By : MarcHolt
Views : 375

When I was a young man back in the mid nineteen sixties I first heard the siren call of Women’s Liberation. Germaine Greer, Angela Davis, and Alice Walker, to name a few, shouted out for women’s rights. They told us how our forefathers had always kept women unequal. It was time to change all that and give women their rightful place in the world.

That was the start of the misunderstandings between men and women up to today. Oh, I know you are going to point out that women had been campaigning for women’s rights long before that, but the 1960’s was when women actually started to achieve a whole range of ‘rights’.

Many of us young men applauded and supported them. After all, we had seen how our fathers had treated our own mothers in the 1950’s. A wife and mother back then had her place well defined in a clear stereotype. She was The Housekeeper; the one who kept the house neat and tidy, did the cooking, and looked after the kids. The Husband was expected to go out into the wide world and work to bring home the money to make the family happy and comfortable.

But when Germaine Greer shed her bra she declared war on men. We dumb buffalo didn’t even see it coming. I clearly remember thinking that it was about time women took their rightful place as equal partners with their men. Silly me. I thought Women’s Liberation was all about making women our equal partners. But really, Germaine and her ilk were planning to not only liberate themselves from us men folk, they were hell bent on cutting us out of the equation completely.

The problem as I see it today is that the pendulum has swung too far in the other direction. Men no longer have any rights. We truly have been relegated to the sidelines.

Modern Marriage

Let’s talk about our modern marriage. But before I do, let me say that this is a ‘worst case’ scenario. I am sure some, perhaps many, marriages are better than the picture I am going to paint. But I bet many of you readers will recognize in your own marriage at least some of the problems I describe.

A young woman today grows up hearing about all the rights and freedoms she has under the law. But that doesn’t stop her dreaming about finding a husband and starting a family. She just thinks that she will be able to correct any faults she finds and mold him in the image she has formed of a perfect marriage. Unfortunately, that image is fashioned by the unreasonable expectations extolled in fashion magazine, soap operas, and TV shows like Opra.

Then she meets “Mr Right”; they fall in love and have a wonderful courtship. He proposes and she plans a big fancy wedding; the whole nine yards if she can.

They get married and at first all is wonderful. The sex is amazing. They love each other madly. And then the kids start coming. When she enters the third trimesta the sex must stop. The husband understands this and supports her. The child arrives and there is still no sex for a while afterwards. But with the thrill of the new person in their lives the husband doesn’t mind too much.

But when the sex does start again, it is never quite the same as it was when they started their journey together. The spark has gone. The child demands more of her time, leaving the husband feeling neglected.

Inevitably, as the kids are growing up the sex becomes more infrequent. She has too much housework to do. She starts getting ‘headaches’ or she is too tired. There is no time, or the time is not right.. He starts getting frustrated.

The wife forced to stay home to look after the children may realize that she has let herself in for a lot more responsibility than the feminists ever told her about. She finds herself stuck with looking after her children and being a homemaker; just like her grandmother in the 1950’s. She loses a lot of the freedom she may have enjoyed as a career woman.

As a result she finds she no longer loves her husband like she did during those heady days of first love either. She doesn’t desire sex all the time, as her husband seems to. Different women handle this different ways, but none of them are satisfactory. If she submits grudgingly to her husband’s demands she feels frustrated, possibly even angry. Or if she refuses her husband’s demands he feels frustrated and possibly angry. Either way, the marriage begins to suffer.

Meanwhile, women today are bombarded with stories in magazines and on TV urging them to ‘find themselves’, to be ‘new women’, to have ‘new interests’ and become ‘more than they currently are’.

As the children grow the husband and wife find they are becoming estranged from each other. Their needs and desires diverge. Until one day she realizes she no longer wants to stay married. She wants to find herself without the burden of a husband she no longer loves. She asks for a divorce.

That’s when the law steps in and things really start to go bad.

Because of the lobbying over the years by feminist groups the laws have been changed to favor women. After all, they argue, didn’t she nurture the baby inside her womb and give it all the love and care it needed?

A good question, as far as it goes. But somewhere along the way the rights of the father were relegated to the sidelines. They no longer have any rights, it seems. Divorced men are expected to pay alimony to the mother of his children, even if she leaves him for her own selfish reasons. The law has been crafted in such a way that the woman is almost always given custody these days.

Men’s Needs

Why is it that to us men women seem to be a completely different species? They don’t think or act like us men. And most of the time we think that’s a Good Thing. After all, we sure wouldn’t want to marry our best beer-swilling, ball playing buddy, would we?

But when it comes to relationships and sex, women’s needs are very different from ours. Yet the law does not take this into account. And often, nor do women.

From the time we reach puberty, men are bombarded by the demands our hormones make on us.

We crave sex. All the time. With any attractive woman.

That’s the truth. Any married man who denies this is either a liar, or delusional.

Any woman who does not recognize this fact is headed for a troubled marriage.

When we get married men usually sublimate this terrible need and concentrate their energies on the woman they love instead.

That doesn’t mean the urge, the craving, the maddening demand, has gone away. It just means that we manage it in favor of our loved ones.

But as the marriage progresses and the sex becomes more infrequent, men start looking at greener pastures, and sometimes venturing into them as well. If they are caught plucking the flowers in that other field and the wife finds out she will often storm out in a fit of justified anger. And then the divorce lawyers step into the breech.

If you ask the woman why she left her husband she will accuse her man of Cheating On Her.

So let’s define Cheating.

Wikipedia defines it this way: Cheating is an act of lying, deception, fraud, trickery, imposture, or imposition. Cheating characteristically is employed to create an unfair advantage, usually in one's own interest, and often at the expense of others.

Yep, that defines it alright. It all comes down to defrauding the other person…not being honest.

So, if that is the case what would happen if the husband were honest with his wife and did not seek to deceive her? What if he discussed his urgent need and told her he would like to have other women outside the marriage? What if he reassured her that he would still remain with his wife and family and support them financially and emotionally in every other way? Would that change things?

In some societies, that is precisely what happens. The French have always had a more practical attitude towards marriage, as have the Thais and Chinese. In France they call the other woman a ‘mistress’. In Thailand she is called a ‘minor wife’ (mia noi), or a ‘gik’ (occasional lover). In these societies, marriage is a much more stable institution. An arrangement like this can offer children the opportunity to grow up in a stable home with two parents and benefit from a rounded relationship. Even if the husband and wife no longer love each other, they are able to live comfortably together and be there for the children.

In fact, that is what happened in the old days before divorce became so easy. But I will discuss this in a minute. Let’s examine….

Women’s Needs

Women have needs too. It has taken our western society a long time to recognize this fact. Unfortunately, in the Middle East and many other countries they still have not learned it at all.

But the fact is, women are biologically just as much in need of sex as any man. They just manifest it differently is all.

There is no need to describe the differences. We all know what they are, and in most cases we have experienced them too.

What I would like to discuss here is the effects of their needs on a marriage or relationship.

A woman craves security and stability. When a man cheats on her he destroys her trust, and of course her love as well. After that, there is nowhere for a marriage to go but down and out.

Unrealistic Expectations

I hope by now reader you begin to see where I am heading with this.

The fact is, Women’s Liberation is responsible for a lot of these problems and misunderstandings.

Men were gulled by the promises of freeing their women from the yolk of old fashioned attitudes in the hope that they could build a loving, Equal, relationship.

That Equality never happened.

Instead, women were given more power over men through new laws until we became mere seed suppliers and then child and wife supporters; punished for our fleeting pleasure and made to pay for it for a lifetime.

Where is the equality in that?

Take some recent cases where men have proved through DNA testing that the child they reared as their own turned out to be the progeny of some other man. Yet the law, based as it is on the old Victorian concept of what a family should be, still insists that the man pay child support anyway. What if we turned the tables on women and did that to them? How would they feel?

Yet women demand that the law make the so-called ‘father’ pay even though the wife/mother is the one who has cheated on him. Not only cheated on him, but also cheated him out of the fruits of his labor and years from his life, not to mention the love he might have built with his own child. In short, she has committed a monstrous crime and the law abets her in it in many states and countries even today.

Women’s’ Liberation when it started out in the 1960’s could have been a wonderful thing for both sexes. We could have righted the wrongs that kept women unequal where it counted, yet preserved their femininity.

Instead we have come to the painful truth we face today. The Women’s Liberation movement has betrayed both sexes. Women have been cheated out of the opportunity to build lasting unions with the men they love and to grow old together in true equality. Men have lost their rights to be able to nurture their children working with a truly equal partner.

Living in Thailand as I do, I often see the sad evidence of the devastation Women’s Liberation has wrought on western society. There are literally thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of men coming to Asia seeking an Asian wife after their western marriage has been shattered.

But do they get what they come looking for?

Not if they come here starry eyed and delusional. Not if they expect Asian women to be submissive doormats, as they hear all too often back home; another stereotype with no basis in truth.

The fact is, Asian women are just like Western women. They too crave security and stability. And when they find it they fight just as hard as their western sisters to hold onto it. But when they find out their man has cheated on them they will walk out just as easily as their sisters do.

Asian women are not the cure for Women’s Liberation.

Clear thinking, honesty, and a dose of sane laws are what will mend the problem.

Is there a solution?

This is such a thorny subject that there can be no clear answers. But one thing I have observed in my research is that divorce is much more likely these days than it ever was in our grandfather’s day. Back then, divorce was difficult under the law. It also carried a social stigma. Children in a marriage were valued and the law tried to protect them from the disruption to their lives a divorce inevitably brings.

Not so today.

If a woman wants to leave an unsatisfactory marriage today she can do it easily, and in many cases she will come out of it way ahead. She will get the house, the car, at least half the money, and she will be supported by her unfortunate ex until she remarries. Given this, many women opt to stay single so that they can milk the cash cow. This leads to single parent families, breeding children who grow up without the balance of a male and female parent. Many of our social problems can be traced directly back to this fact.

I would like to suggest that men start lobbying harder to protect not only themselves, but their marriages too. We can do this by getting our lawmakers to pass laws making it much harder to get a divorce. It should be incumbent on the person filing for divorce to prove beyond doubt that a divorce is the only reasonable way to ensure the health and safety of any children.

Where there is a paternity case, the person filing for custody should be made to pay for a thorough investigation by an independent body; preferably one that is not beholden to the courts.

In cases where infidelity is the cause of the breakdown, both parties should be forced to undergo counseling with a view to reconciliation. If one partner stubbornly refuses to accept the reasons of the other for straying, then the counseling must continue until both parties agree to a resolution.

In other words, every effort must be made to patch up the marriage and bring the partners into accord again. Only when it is very clear this is impossible, should the go-ahead be given for a divorce. Very few married men will stray if their home life is good. So the counselor should attempt to get both parties to see this and accept ways to reconcile.

To explore this thoroughly would take far more room than I have here. But I hope you can see what I am getting at. Marriage vows today are not respected like they were in the past.

It’s Time

It’s time that married couples contemplating divorce are forced to consider the commitment they have made to each other and stick by it rather than taking the easy way out.

It’s time that “Liberated” women face up to the monster they have created and start modifying their behavior to create a more equal relationship with men.

It’s time for a serious review of the laws currently on the books and some judicious rewriting to ensure fair treatment for all.

It’s also time for men to find their balls and stop lying down like doormats and letting women walk all over them. You are just as responsible for the mess as the women’s libbers are.

A marriage, or even a long-term relationship, is not a battleground. And when it does become one, no one wins.

No, it should be an equal partnership. That doesn’t necessarily mean that the roles should be reversed. If a man is going out to work every day, his wife should not expect him to come home and help her with the housework. If she can’t manage that on her own then she is not pulling her weight in the marriage. And of course the same thing applies if the woman goes out to work and the man stays home.

If both partners work, then they should also share the household responsibilities equally.

If the man is not getting enough sex at home, he would do much better to sit down with his wife and discuss it honestly instead of sneaking out to get some on the side. Lying and cheating only create more problems. Honesty will help both partners recognize the problem and work towards an equitable solution.

My Wish for you

I am sure not everyone will agree with my views. The feminists will throw up their arms in horror at my viewpoint. To you ladies I say don’t bother writing in to abuse me. Save the time and effort and instead sit down and begin an honest appraisal of the damage your “Liberation” crusade has wrought. Perhaps if you start to recognize the problems you will begin to work with your menfolk to find a better way to live and grow old together.

To those unhappy divorced women who are growing old alone I offer my sympathy. But perhaps your younger sisters can learn from your mistakes and not rush into divorce so easily. Living and dieing alone is not a pleasant prospect for any of us.

To those couples that think monogamy is the only ‘natural’ relationship I urge you to look at the way different cultures handle a man’s overriding sex urge. There are other options open. One, or some, may even be better than the monogamy monotony you are suffering through now. Perhaps a little spice in the relationship will actually benefit you and your partner. At the very least, if you discuss your problems openly you will improve your relationship.

To you men who have already suffered through a divorce and lost close contact with your children, I offer my deepest sympathy. But you serve as an object lesson for other men. Instead of rushing into divorce, or letting their wife browbeat them into divorce, perhaps they will see what you have become and work hard not to become another statistic like you.

To all of you happily married couples I say congratulations. But don’t become smug. A marriage is a work in progress. You both need to work at it continuously to ensure it survives all the way to the end.

 

© Marc Holt. All rights reserved by the author.


Like this story? Share it with others: Stumble It! Add to Yahoo! My Web Bookmark to Del.icio.us Bookmark to Furl Spurl This! Add to Reddit Bookmark to Newsvine


Related Articles

» An Atheist State

Rating

Teen



Comments / Feedback

Dana
May 1, 2008, 11:11

Attn: Mr. Holt

Two Things--

(1) A wise man once told me that all a man needs is a box of tools, a beer cooler, a dog, and a boat. His name was Bob Nose and he lived on a houseboat in Cruz Bay harbor on the island of St. John in the US Virgin Islands in the 70's. I think of him more and more as I age.

(2) More on the subject(s) of your essay can be explored in an essay by me on this site called THE CHILD SEEMED SUCH A GOOD IDEA.
_____________________________

Academic Addenda Note: I think it is helpful in considering women objectively, and dispassionately, and charitably, and kindly, and scientifically; to never forget that they are the spawn of the Devil and our implacable foes until we draw our last angry bitter horny breath.
Marc Holt
May 1, 2008, 13:49

Yes, I remember your essay, Dana. But I don't share your morose view of females in general and Thais fems in particular. However, as always your stories amuse and occasionally inform. Not sure what your comments here signify though...this one you left in particular???
NOSPEWSBIATCHES
May 3, 2008, 09:11

When men realize marraige is essentially state sponsored slavery (mental and financial) in the USA they will stop getting married and enjoy women for what they offer which is pretty much just the pussy. Pussy is just a commodity, like steak or lobster and just cause i want to enjoy it on occasion does not mean i have to buy the restaurant. Also always remember meat goes bad quickly so alway enjoy new young tender steak and lobster at a variety of restaurants. Your like will be happier and after all what else is there.
Mike
May 3, 2008, 09:29

A pretty misogynistic viewpoint there Mr Nospews. Not only that but demeaning and just in general a nasty comment to make that could have been put in a much more polite way for general public consumption, don't you think? While I can agree that the divorce laws in the states and other parts of the world tend to really favor the woman's side, and there is a bias against men in today's societies in the west, I'd say there is much more to marriage than just sex. What else is there? Family, children, love perhaps? Mutual respect and love for another person? The problem I see is so many enter into marriage without much thought, without open eyes, a plan, mutual respect, and no idea of what the 'contract' of marriage is really all about. What you describe is sex for sexs' sake. This can be fun and enjoyable, but after a while it does pale for many. The lobster and steak becomes bland. Why? It lacks spice over time, becomes boring. It ceases to be fun and becomes just another animal mating. No emotion, no feelings are involved other than primal instinct. That's okay for an animal, but I'd think most human males want more from their relationships.
It does need to be said though that the marriage contract is too easily broken in these modern times. There also seems to be little downside for the women in these dissolutions and the men bears the brunt and burden of the breakup for the most part in most cases.

I take it you have gone through a nasty divorce sir?
Dana
May 3, 2008, 13:26

"a nasty comment to make that could have been put in a much more polite way for general public consumption, don't you think?"

No, I don't think. This is supposed to be a comment forum where people can make comments. Mr. NOSPEWSBIATCHES used no objectionable or inflammatory language and he had the right to make a comment.

Happy coupling by lucky people does not prove the point, it proves the exception. If we add up all the single adults in the world and then add to that all the unhappy parings the overwhelming and incontrovertible evidence is that men and women should not be spending long term time together. Any other conclusion is based on wishful thinking, or romanticism, or delusion, or the personal luck of happy coupling for which in most cases neither player should take too much credit. Life is mostly luck; good luck and bad luck.

I think the web administrator owes Mr. NOSPEWSBIATCHES an apology. He played by the rules and his reward was a patronizing remark costumed as greater and more mature knowledge of what constitutes appropriate male female pairing. My contempt for web administrators posturing as more qualitatively evolved is acid.

Jago Turner
May 3, 2008, 15:33

One interesting, or not, point that my divorce lawyer let me in on was that a woman can and usually does forgive a man for having the odd fling here or there once they have children together but she won't forgive herself or the marriage when she starts having flings. Therefore, in his view, whether it is admitted at the time or not, most break-ups leading to divorce occur as a result of female infidelity. Of course this is based on one divorce lawyer in one part of the UK so as a generalisation it probably doesn't mean much. I just thought I'd toss it into the pot. Maybe in many cases it isn't so much the woman's sex drive that diminishes. It's just that the seven year itch cuts more deeply into her flesh. We might need a scratch. They need to rip it apart.

On a related point I'd add that, in my experience, Thai women who live in the UK don't seem as likely to demand custody of the children as Western women. In the case of my ex-wife and that of some of her friends who went through similar divorces at exactly the same time (It may be racist to suggest it but there is a tendency for culturally dislocated Thai women to develop something of a pack mentality) there was little sense of true maternalism once the children could walk and talk. I know of two Thai women here who left their husbands in custody of children from former husbands/lovers. I've thought about this a lot over the years and I suspect that this might be due less to irresponsibility than to a profound sense of self loathing. I am still in contact with a lot of those women (including those who kept their children) and they do seem to be about the most lost and unhappy souls I've encountered in my life and I've met a lot of lost unhappy souls. Divorced English women seem to protect themselves with a sheen of self righteousness but divorced Thai women seem to be waiting to die and go to Hell for their sins (and don't let anyone tell you that Thais don't believe in Hell).

My ex-wife is something of an exception in that she married a muslim, wears a hijab and seems to be trying to pray and endure her way back into God's good books. Her husband once confided in me, sitting in a hospital cafeteria while she was about to give birth to their second child together, that he sorted her out by giving her a good beating and that I could have saved my marriage if I'd been prepared to do the same.

Personally I'm not a fan of the Muslim way of life. I like to live in a world filled with whores, booze and pornography (not that I have much of an opportunity, as an impoverished lone parent, to even consider playing in those waters - I just like to know they're there). Being left by your wife to raise your child/children alone is tough but I'd sooner face this than live under some sharia law where it's seen as acceptible, under certain circumstances, to beat your wife. Call me a squeamish pussy-whipped liberal but I prefer the idea that women have the freedom to be ****s if they want to.

I agree that it does seem that divorce and custody laws (especially those in the US) need some serious amendments and that at the moment it does seem that a lot of men have drawn the short straw. I can't comment on this because I was treated fairly both by the law and my ex-wife but then I think I had a pretty cool lawyer who laughed at the idea that having been left by my wife she would, later on, have the right to claim her child in some Kramer vs Kramer style.

As for the notion of a marriage that lasts from sixteen to death... I think that this is probably something that you can forget about unless you are willing to relocate into another society with a completely different set of values to our own. When I was a child I used to think it would be pleasant to mate for life, feel secure in marriage and devote my energies into saving the world or building the first flying car. But marriages don't work like that. They take all this work and effort and it becomes easy to see why so many of history's great innovators have either been celibates, homosexuals and whore****ers or had wives like servants and servants like wives. Working at a modern marriage (or the one proscribed by the media) would take so much work as to render its partners mediocre in every other walk of life.

Being single isn't so bad. Especially if you can meet the occasional self loathing middle aged Thai woman with a one way ticket to Hell. As for dying alone... I'm not sure that there's any other way to die.
Marc Holt
May 3, 2008, 18:37

As always Mr Turner, you comments are well considered and much appreciated. Marriage does take a lot of hard work, and too many couples are not willing to put in the effort. Call me old fashioned if you will, but I still believe a marriage should be for life. Not because of any religious belief, but simply because when two people make that commitment it should be a very serious one if children are involved.

Would working hard at your marriage render you mediocre? I disagree. Two people working together with responsibility towards each other makes them very special in my book. They may not write the Great Novel, or be football stars, or any of the other things we admire 'stars' for. But they are more worthy of our admiration simply because they are so...well, admirable.

When I married my current wife I committed to her. Sure, we have our ups and downs. But on the whole I wouldn't be anywhere else ever again. Perhaps that is because at 60 I have managed to cast out most of my demons and found happiness in the simple things; great kids, a wife who dotes on me and looks after me like I am a prince, a secure, comfortable home. These are gems you can't go out and buy.

I feel sorry for NOSPEWSBIATCHES. It's obvious he has had a very bad experience with women, or a woman. I hope he gets over it and starts to live life again. He is probably yet another victim of Women's Liberation.
chuckwoww
May 3, 2008, 20:40

A very thoughtful piece of writing by Mr. Turner. I especially liked..."We might need a scratch. They need to rip it apart."....I have been on both sides of that equation. i.e. I have scratched and been ripped apart. But I have also strayed and been forgiven. It all comes down to freedom I think....if we want it for ourselves we should allow it for our partner.
Dana
May 4, 2008, 06:11

"Marriage does take a lot of hard work, and too many couples are not willing to put in the effort."

At the risk of incurring more politically correct wrath from Mr. Holt I must say I think this notion is bankrupt. I have never endorsed this idea. I don't think successful coupling should require any work or talk. It (the relationship) should run naturally on it's own steam without outside influence or the need for internal communication or compromise or understanding.

In short, if someone in a relationship with me says that "we have to talk" - I just start packing my bags. The relationship has no future and I ain't wasting my time. I believe talking and counseling and compromising and seeing the others person's point of view etc. blah blah blah are all the bleatings of the weak and the poor decision makers. Cut the cord. Move on.

Luckily for me I am probably not going to have to waste any more of my time like this. I pretty much pushed back from the woman table about fifteen years ago. I don't hold doors for them, I stop listening as soon as they use the word feelings, I get up and walk as soon as they start to talk about their sisters or their mother, and I am not going to finance another baby grunted out to satisfy their needs.

You want to spend your emasculated time talking and listening go ahead; I've got a date on the boardwalk tomorrow morning at 9:30 and I hope Fa is there. She isn't interested in me and I am not interested in her; we are equal. We might be ahead of many married couples who in fact are not treating each other equally.
Mike
May 4, 2008, 13:33

Dana,

Apology? This is my own opinion coming from me, Mike. Not from TS.com admin. I myself have been through a horrible painful divorce, with kids involved. It was a disaster and very damaging. Still, I cannot see myself thinking in the manner Mr. Spews described in his commentary. Pussy is a commodity? Really. The war between the sexes has many casualties. Many are damaged for life. I count myself lucky my damage seems to have healed over the years. I attribute the healing to finding a woman who could love me as I am, and treat me like a man, instead of a commodity. Personal opinions, and I have the right to disagree. Condescending? I think not, but maybe I came across harsher than I intended to. And yes, I myself would have worded this comment a bit differently. Maybe his anger is fresh and undiluted. But if I found that much wrong with Mr Spew's commnet as an administrator, well, the comment would not be on here would it? It was not edited and has been posted. So what should I apologize for? My own opinion? Can any man honestly say he has no wish for a real relationship based on mutual respect, love, sexual compatability, and all the rest? Be truthful now. If you found the 'right' one, wouldn't all the wrong ones fade into memory and history and the good relationship possibly stand the test of time? I'd still like to think so. Maybe I am wrong. Only time will tell. Time heals all wounds they say, whoever 'they' may be. A good relationship helps heal those wounds quicker I feel. And yes, there is a lot of luck involved at times. But win or lose, I feel the gamble can be worth it.

Mr. Holt always comes up with topical, interesting, and highly commentable stories here. Always loaded for debate. :-)

p.s. If Mr Spew took offense at my comments, I apologize.
Santa
May 4, 2008, 16:52

Marc:

Your writing "Divorced men are expected to pay alimony to the mother of his children, even if she leaves him for her own selfish reasons. The law has been crafted in such a way that the woman is almost always given custody these days." irks me.

The word "alimony" is an Americanism, and has no place in Australian Law. It just doesn't exist here.

There is "Property Settlement", and that is best described as the division of the spoils. It involves deciding who has brought what into the marriage [de-facto or de-jure] and balancing that against where any child[ren] of the relationship is/are going to live.

Current Australian Law instructs Magistrates of the Family Law Courts that they should start from the assumption that the children of any failed relationships should spend equal time in the care of both the father and the mother. If a Magistrate hands down a decision favouring one parent more than the other, That magistrate must provide justification to both parties. For this reason, many decisions in the Family Law Court [and the Federal Magistrates' Court] are reserved, meaning they are not delivered/handed down, for 2 or more weeks.

The Magistrate needs the time to compose the reasons for varying from the 50-50 rule.

In the case of my 9-year-old son, the reason why I got the majority of custodial time was because of his mother's drunkenness, her unwillingness to feed the boy while she was intoxicated, and her lack of preparedness to discipline him when he fell foul of the school authorities.

Between the completion of the legal proceedings and the handing down of the Magistrate's decision, the boy was dumped on my doorstep, and I discovered several more reasons why he should never have been left in the care of his mother.

She had been working in one of 'those places' where females rent their bodies, but she didn't like the house taking its percentage, so she started taking customers home. The house and her landlady found out what was happening at about the same time as each other, so she got fired from the house and evicted by her landlady at the same time. Thus, the boy came to me early.

Then there is 'Child Support'. It takes into account the percentage of time the child spends with each parent, the income of both parents [the ability to pay thing], and a few other minor factors. Nowadays, there is the strong likelihood that neither parent will need to pay child support, assuming that both have a responsible attitude to the care of any child[ren].

Jago Turner: An excellent comment! From your heart, as usual.
Marc Holt
May 4, 2008, 18:41

Thanks for pointing out what happens in Australia Santa. However, I mainly had the US in mind when I wrote...hence alimony. But your comment just underslines that the damage wrought by Women's Liberation is universal in the west.
NOSPEWSBIATCHES
May 4, 2008, 21:11

Mike,

No nasty divorce. Was happily married and have a beautiful son. Get along great with the ex. I just realized i wanted to eat at many different steak and lobster restaurants and it was not fair to my wife at the time so i got divorced. Only cost is minimal (
RSS 2.0: Syndicate this article

Add Comment
* Name


Site



*Image Validation (?)


*Comments / Feedback





Print Article Print Article
Send to a friend Send to a friend
Save as PDF Save as PDF
Rate this Article :

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10
Poor Excellent