Sketch for a sexpat

By : Icarus
Views : 349

Sit down.

Draw up the chair.

Where were we?

Nearly a year ago. Three girls together on the stage; jeans and panties rolled half down, unmatchable naked ass. He never forgot.

Recently returned from some sex tourist destination or other making him seem kind of hard core.

Time had passed, it was already November, she was back in the Bar. It was only the second night.  Do you believe a prostitute feels butterflies in her stomach?

“I don’t remember what I do with customer”. Muttered pensively more than once, even if libido surely wins out.

He dropped by that night alone, sitting in his usual spot, near the mirrors.

We had discussed how well Catherine knew him. She had promised  but a customer is a customer. And he is rich and good-looking.

‘I dancing..He look me’..I no want..I do tinni’ gesturing looking away with a mute defiance. Then; ‘I no like he.’ Plaintively

He came again about 10 days later.

The next night she recounted somewhat incredulously;

‘He buy lady drink..I sit he..he want go long time…he want give me 1000 baht.’

I was joining her in disbelief.

"I no like long time…...I fighting he…….. many customer want give me money maak ma long time.. .. I no want……….I no like fighting customer..1000 baht’!

The figure, spat with the craft and weight of the Bar.

I nastily noted the first time the commercial creature unequivocally evident beneath the obvious damsel spirit.

She had moved off too quickly, curious eyes upon them. But not yet finished. He liked another girl, though not from that incandescent night before. She was already sitting with a customer. He came over. Spoke to her, offering a lady drink. She waved him away. He took her by the shoulder...

Just here the account was more or less petering out.

‘Lady no like he...no sit he... every lady want money Ok...but lady good tinni (tapping her head)….. lady know.’

I thought of him, and sadly of the harsh prescriptive mores of the Bar. About appearances, and how they can protect us too. Without resolution.

When I next saw him there I didn’t move over to talk, though it was hardly clear cut.

Only two more incidents; weeks later when we were sitting outside, she suddenly scrambled to hide, down behind the table; ‘Puan wife you’ she clattered warningly as I gazed along the Cowboy at the crowd, adding helplessly, ‘He with friend I go already, two time’. And knowing her vulnerabilities by now quite well, I shared the frisson of anxiety.

Then not so long ago I heard they had come again and bought more than  lady drink.

 

Oh  yes, and the last time we met was at a funeral.

 

© Icarus. All rights reserved by the author.


Like this story? Share it with others: Stumble It! Add to Yahoo! My Web Bookmark to Del.icio.us Bookmark to Furl Spurl This! Add to Reddit Bookmark to Newsvine


Related Articles

» Falangland
» No Further Action
» The VIP
» Therapy
» Gestation Myth
» Arriving
» Jack Golf
» TurkFist's World
» TurkFist's World..part 2
» TurkFist's World..part 3
» TurkFist's World...final
» Some Effects of Seclusion
» Min's story.. part 1
» Min's story..final
» The Picture
» Cowboy
» A Stone's Throw in Nong Khai
» Minor Fugue
» Festival notes
» Slight desserts
» The door in the floor
» Some days of Mercedes' autumn
» Occam's Razor

Rating

PG



Comments / Feedback

steve rosse
May 20, 2008, 21:06

"Recently returned from some sex tourist destination or other making him seem kind of hard core."

"...making him seem kind of hard core." is beautiful. We've all known the guy who thinks he's hard core because he got up the courage to pay for sex. It's another line, or at least an idea, that makes me wish I'd written it. But "Recently returned from some sex tourist destination or other..." limps and hobbles like common speech.

I always read these through to the end, and there's very little in the world I have patience enough to read all the way through. But I'm always disappointed. The author asks me to pull up a chair, but then his attention drifts and his story takes unexplainable turns and at the end I'm left scratching my head and somewhat sorry I sat and listened. There's a wit behind the writing that is encouraging, a facility with words that sometimes amazes me, but ultimately there's just too much of the feeling that the author is writing for his own gratification and not mine.
icarus
May 20, 2008, 23:28

Steve thank you for your comment on this piece.

But.

'Limps and hobbles like common speech' has me scratching my head and reaching for my manual of aesthetics. Just what is wrong with common speech? Did you perhaps just put on your elitist cap by mistake?

Also you make it seem like a favour to have read through to the end and perhaps it was. I dont usually see the reader /writer transaction that way however

As for dissapointment- what did you expect? Isnt it as advertised 'A sketch for a sexpat"?

Moreover what is unexplained? Shall put up footnotes?

Last and probably least; who ever said gratification had any thing to do with it. Another unexamined aesthetic there I sniff....
Dana
May 21, 2008, 06:38

", but ultimately there's just too much of the feeling that the author is writing for his own gratification and not mine."

Maybe this is exactly what the author is doing. I write for my own gratification first (I am the first reader); and I have zero interest in peer review, or helpful lessons, or civilized criticism. I am not the only human constructed this way; just apparently the only one to tell the truth.

I want first to be told that I am handsome, and smart, and a great writer. After hearing this first, I really do not want to hear anything second. I am highly suspicious of people who get all bubbly and fawning when they or something they have created is being criticized. I only have two choices: pity them or do not believe them.

What happens to this PC idea that has so much social currency with the western nation cocktail party set if we extrapolate? How about someone coming into your home and making helpful peer review criticisms of your children and your wife? Another great idea I should subscribe to? Bull****.

I want my writing to please me (it always does); and it would be nice if it got attention from others and pleased them. People who are not nice call that vanity, nice people call that normal. I just keep writing.

I subscribe to no PC notions of civility regarding writer- reader-writer social intercourse. I do not believe criticizm makes me a better person; and I do not believe people who lap up criticizm like a dog lapping up vomit are better than me. I am completely outside the circle of mythic beliefs about how getting stabbed in the side by Romans is good for you.

I choose my peers, they do not choose me. I set my goals, they are not set by others. I give myself the prizes, I do not wait for someone else to prize me. I speak for my writing, and I let my writing speak for me. My internal opinion of myself is complete and independent and adamantine. Expressions of ego such as this are incendiary. There are no names I have not been called. I just keep writing.

I formed the Church of Dana and the Dana Fan Club as a way to invite people into my world; not as a supplication to be approved by others. The smart people smiled, the others vilified. Writing is like ping-pong; if the reader does not hit the ball back there is not much the writer can do. I'll meet anyone on the literary fifty yard line. But it is not my job to carry the reader the whole distance.

My writing is unique and original. It is not supposed to refect anyone else other than me. If it was re-written, or re-contented, or re-toned, or re-PCed it would not be me. It is what it is supposed to be. No one has ever tried to copy my style or my voice. Good for them. I hope they are working on their own style and their own voice. And I hope they are not listening to any critics. I hope they are just listening to themselves. Those are the people I want to meet in bars.

steve rosse
May 21, 2008, 08:26

Icarus my colleague: Thanks so much for taking my comments as they were intended, as helpful suggestions. And we're off:

"'Limps and hobbles like common speech" We don't speak to each other in any way similar to the way we expect to read language. John Grisham cannot take a court transcript, publish it verbatim, and call it a court novel. In common speech we rely so much on inflection, and facial expression, and even body language, that when you read transcripts of spoken conversations they are often unintelligible. Even when we speak on the phone, robbed of our faces and bodies to help us communicate, we are often misunderstood. Some writers use common speech in dialogue, because it rings true there. Your writing has no room for such mundane strings of syllables.

The reader is always doing the writer a favor. The reader gives the writer precious hours of his life which can never be recovered, and often the reader provides the writer's salary. If a writer is wasting my time I throw his book out the window. A writer had better write for the reader's gratification, if he wants anybody to read what he writes, most certainly if he expects anybody to pay for what he writes. But again, many people scribble as a form of masturbation. That's fine, I just object when they call themselves "writers." They haven't earned the title. If it was that easy, every human who is literate could call himself or herself a writer.

I'm disappointed with the piece above because in the end I felt like I was doing the writer a favor by reading his story. That's not how it's supposed to go. I don't do Mark Twain any favors when I read Huckleberry Finn. He changes my life when I read his books. He works for me.

And finally (though I hope not, this is great fun) "what's unexplained?" you ask, no doubt with a Cheshire grin. Everything is unexplained and you know it. You work hard to inject mystery into your writing. No Aristotlean unities for you. No beginning, middle and end. No character development, no protagonist with a clearly defined goal, no antagonist blocking the protagonist's progress toward his goal. No gentle, easy, arc of narrative. Just hints, clues, suggestions, riddles, puzzles, and (I suspect) some downright bull****.

More! More! I hate it you bastard; give me more!
Marc Holt
May 21, 2008, 08:54

Icarus, if you go back to your previous submissions here and read the comments the recurring theme throughout has always been that we don't understand what you are writing about. Your prose is too sparse, there is no connection between the ideas. How are we to be expected to know and understand what you are thinking?

It is obvious you are a deep thinker and you have the capacity to write very well. But try writing with the reader in mind. I have almost given up reading your stories now because I just can't understand them.
Marc Holt
May 21, 2008, 09:00

Dana, the difference between your stories and Icarus' is that yours are linear; the reader can follow the story and understand it, no matter how outrageous you get.

The whole point of writing a story, in my very humble opinion, is to tell a story. I just don't get that from Icarus. Reading his submissions is like reading a series of extremely terse vignettes without any connecting pieces to glue it all together.
Dana
May 21, 2008, 09:43

"But again, many people scribble as a form of masturbation. That's fine, I just object when they call themselves "writers."

Really Mr. Rosse? Masturbation? Are we really going to go down this road? Masturbation? What would your reaction have been if I had offered hyperbole like that? Scribblers who call themselves writers are masturbating Mr. Rosse? Do you want to be taken seriously?
icarus
May 21, 2008, 12:26

Steve: You have an appetite for debate which I only minutely share but to take your points approximately sequentially.

" We don't speak to each other in any way similar to the way we expect to read language’.



This, while obviously true, merely suppresses the obvious. Writing is informed by common speech. The detail and dynamic of how and to what extent is a question I have neither the wit, knowledge nor the time to tease out now, but the base assertion is self evident to me.

So I do not understand your objection to ‘Recently back from some sex tourist destination or other…’ I do understand it lacks a pronoun, I see too that it does not strictly follow the line before either syntactically or in a joined up writing type logic sort of way, though surely you the reader can see why it is there? Its not a great phrase but it is working, journeyman toward the sketch I am attempting isnt it?

‘The reader is always doing the writer a favor. The reader gives the writer precious hours of his life….’


This is precious in the pejorative sense of the adjective and parsimonious too. If you dont see this then I will say it elsewhere.

While Dana outlines one aesthetic and you another there are of course myriad others.

I am trying to say something to the reader about my truth, reality and I do care how ‘you’ respond but not enough to ask for the suspension of disbelief. I don’t want to gratify anybody in that sense.

I am with Dana on masturbation. I left the boys locker room 40 years ago and this vocabulary simply doesn’t work for me.

Similarly if you think my writing is ‘bull****’…...

As for explication, Aristotle was superseded decades ago in the western canon of writing.
Don’t you know that?

Actually I am scrupulous about the stuff I put up here. If you read all the pieces carefully very little is ‘unexplained’ though it is a work in progress…..

Marc: I truly am sorry it doesn’t work for you. It is my loss.
steve rosse
May 22, 2008, 02:14

"I am with Dana on masturbation. I left the boys locker room 40 years ago and this vocabulary simply doesn’t work for me."

Guys, "masturbation" is an English word meaning "self gratification." It is a clinical term, a scientific term lacking any emotional baggage. If you want to speak about self gratification in polite society, you call it masturbation. Similarly, penis, vagina, intercourse, fellatio, and cunnilingus are English terms that appear in newspapers and magazines every day, not to mention medical text books. If they make you uncomfortable, I'm sorry. But "masturbation" is the best-suited word to describe the activity of writing solely for one's own pleasure, and it's a word acceptable at any Duke's dinner party, so that's the word I chose.
icarus
May 22, 2008, 17:49

Ok lets try this another way. It just sort of grates
steve rosse
May 22, 2008, 22:10

"Ok lets try this another way. It just sort of grates"
I'm sorry. Really. You're not the first person to say I'm annoying. I work alone all day and as soon as I get to speak to somebody, even on-line, the dam bursts and it all just comes out. Unfortunately, in this forum it comes out unedited, and as I said, robbed of facial expression and body language and inflection, misunderstandings take place. I will consider my words more carefully in future. Thanks again for your patience.
icarus
May 23, 2008, 00:16

Gracious.......
Victor
May 23, 2008, 03:21

I really loved this sketch, more like a poem, fragmented yet connected by a dark thread.
Marc Holt
May 23, 2008, 07:49

Steve, you said it all very clearly. If Icarus is unwilling to learn from your wise words then there is nothing more to be said is there? Writers DO write for an audience. Otherwise, what is the point except mere masturbation?

Dana claims he writes for himself, but I doubt it. His stories are always entertaining, witty, and well crafted. They are different. And that is what makes him a good writer. He can claim whatever he likes about his motivation, but in the end it comes down to making people want to read his ideas, no matter how batty (meant in a nice way Dana).

Writing is a funny profession. We tend to be solitary, prickly, and full of ideas that are bursting to be read. Getting them out coherently enough that readers want more is what makes a good writer. As you said, anyone can write, but very few can be writers.

Icarus is infuriating because he writes so well, but is ultimately an enigma. I would love to be able to understand what is going on inside his head. I read the words, but the meaning just eludes me, as it does others too. I hope, Icarus, that you will take these comments in the spirit they are intended and give us more, but more that we can fully appreciate.
icarus
May 23, 2008, 11:36


"But again, many people scribble as a form of masturbation. That's fine, I just object when they call themselves "writers."

'As you said, anyone can write, but very few can be writers.'

I despise this semi-mystical, frequently testosterone fuelled, claptrap about writers, scribblers, real writers, onanism ad nauseum...

Go category chop in some other forest!

There are texts

People produce them....
Dana
May 23, 2008, 12:41

"I will consider my words more carefully in future." - Steve Rosse

That sound you heard was me falling down. I am glad, however, that we are not getting into throwing OED's at each other. Gathering under the golden bough to cogitate about punctuation and syntax is all very well; but often the only syntax I am interested in is the extra fee I have to pay the girl.
Ikkrang
May 23, 2008, 17:23

Sketches are just that, a few lines drawn sparsely, sometimes ambiguously, leaving it for the reader to fill in the gaps using their own imagination, or their memories of similar experiences.

So much of the 'dialogue' in bars isn't dialogue at all, but fragments of sentences, that can even be more get misinterpreted due to the language confusion between the falang with little Thai and the BG with little English.

I suppose you could say this is a bit impressionistic. I seem to remember impressionist painters also were accused of not being proper painters, because they didn't follow the 'established rules'.

This was offered as a sketch, and it is. Maybe most of Icarus' writing are sketches. So what?

MH> Icarus is infuriating because he writes so well, but is ultimately an enigma. I would love to be able to understand what is going on inside his head.<

Maybe, so does he....

Although, unlike some here, I have not written much in public, and wouldn't consider myself a writer, I have on occasion written things where the process of writing actually helped me put my thoughts, feelings and experiences in a different light, helped me see these things from a different perspective, and sometimes helped integrate them for me.

I am not saying this is what Icarus is doing, but I think it is a valid reason to write. Publishing, especially on the internet, can give an opportunity to receive yet different perspectives on mine.

Yes, for me there is a bit too much emphasis here in the discussion about some people's obsession with strict formal writing conventions, getting a beginning, middle and end, completely logical and coherent, predictable characters, clear roles of goodies and baddies, pre masticated narrative and storyline in the style of 'The Famous Five", and not enough acceptance that the world described here is NOT straightforward, unambiguous, logical, but fragmented, contradictory, often inexplicable and infuriatingly missing details that tie the points together.
That is life.
RSS 2.0: Syndicate this article

Add Comment
* Name


Site



*Image Validation (?)


*Comments / Feedback





Print Article Print Article
Send to a friend Send to a friend
Save as PDF Save as PDF
Rate this Article :

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10
Poor Excellent