The Butterfly

By : korski
Views : 1119

Every monger with even modest credentials knows all about the butterfly label. Hookers will ask him at some point--when the suspicion arises as to whether or not he’s going to return for round two or three or be a worthy investment: Are you a butterfly? Or in the Philippines, if they have reason to think you might be that and a bit more, they will ask: Are you a helicopter? (I’m not quite sure of the image they have in mind. A warship? Lots of territory to be covered, or already covered?)

The “smart” butterfly will never admit to being one, and for good reason. The hooker, with even a little experience, if told she is with a butterfly will conclude one or all of the following: a. He’s just like that asshole Thai or Filipino boyfriend or husband I once had who got me pregnant and as soon as I got fat in the belly and turned my back he was out chasing another girl, and this I don’t want more of and therefore this customer is a bad bet for being a long-time boyfriend or husband; b. I better try to get as much as I can from him as soon as I can, including—and most of all—a shopping trip tomorrow, and perhaps I’d also better give him a good story about a sick and dying father or an operation I need for a nonexistent tumor on my left breast; and c. I’ll do what I have to do to earn my money, but damn if I’m going to give him the full Girl Friend Experience or a good blowjob, or one at all unless he demands it.

So, then, no true butterfly with any brains will reveal his hand, a hand that rests on two fundamental premises: Novelty is more important than knowing or expecting that going a second time with a hooker will be as good as it was the first time; and all hookers are losers in the arena of long-term relationships and therefore it is foolhardy to get emotionally involved with them.

As committed as a true butterfly is to never going with the same hooker a second or third time, he knows how they think about butterflies and, dumb as they might be in other ways, how they rationally reason. He adamantly denies that he is a butterfly, and in fact he behaves as if this lovely Thai or Filipina marvel of a thousand bed tricks and unbeatable charms that he chooses for a night or two is someone he simply cannot do without. To the extent that he says anything to her about this rather sensitive issue of butterflying, he addresses the issue by indicating that their relationship—brief as it has been for the one or two days (and the last day he will be with her)—is headed down a road that spells seriousness and commitment and, of course, the real possibility of marriage. A blatant and bold lie? Of course he’s lying, but so what? He knows if he knows anything at all that he’ll have to crawl a country mile using his nose as locomotion to be as good a liar as any Thai hooker, and though the Filipinas aren’t nearly as wily and clever and convincing at the art of lying as their Thai sisters, plenty of them have lying down to what might loosely be called a science.

In all of this, there is a small irony in that a great many hookers (most?) will get indignant if they are in turned called butterflies. Their response is usually: I am not a butterfly! What I do is just the nature of my business. Which is true enough—and there’s no need to get into fine distinctions about those few cases where one monger will take a hooker for a week or two. Hookers aren’t really butterflies, I suppose. They are, rather, the nectar that mongers are drawn to and so often can’t resist, in exchange of course for a known quantity of the local currency.

Even the dedicated butterfly who lives by the rule of not taking a hooker more than twice or three times finds himself being tempted in Thailand and the Philippines—in a way very rarely possible in the West—to fall into that trap called love where he becomes blinded to what she does and he does and the demands that will soon be placed on him and cannot be easily resisted because of dramatic changes in brain chemistry in those same loci where all serious addictions are chemically expressed. The savvy and wily hookers embrace all these changes that they cannot articulate and in fact do not understand because, among other things, it gives them the prospect of something long-term and even permanent, and, in addition, a welcome release from all the mindless dancing and blaring music and the uncertainty of whether the day’s return will be small or predictably good—good meaning at least getting paid the local going rate for going all night.

Lastly, the true or dedicated butterfly, consumed by a desire for novelty (bringing into play those “promiscuous genes” that are the products of natural selection and the “wired” desire to maximize one’s fitness or reproductive success), knows, because of that burdensome thing in his head called consciousness, that there will be plenty of moments of indecision when the hooker for the night proves so charming and so great in bed that he feels almost compelled to take her for a second night. The question he faces again and again, and sometimes struggles with mightily, is this: Will the novelty of a new experience, “bad” or unwelcome as some of the novelty will surely be, outweigh the pleasures and good moments of the sure bet and the predictable behavior that quickly and inevitably brings on boredom? With rare exception, the true butterfly answers in the affirmative. The true or dedicated butterfly, then, is a man not just committed to novelty, and with a clear vision that all hookers are losers in the arena of long-term relationships, but also a man who loves to gamble and is willing to take his shares of losses that accompany almost all novelty.

 

 

The author can be contacted at:  korski1@cox.net

 

© Korski. All rights reserved by the author.


Like this story? Share it with others: Stumble It! Add to Yahoo! My Web Bookmark to Del.icio.us Bookmark to Furl Spurl This! Add to Reddit Bookmark to Newsvine


Related Articles

» Note on a Fish Head
» Opium Night Blues
» My Broken Moral Compass
» Jit Stories
» The Pickled Chinaman’s Head
» Was It the Colonels or was it Wan?
» Who Smells Bad in Southeast Asia?
» Nguyen Viet Chuan
» Is This Story Fact or Fiction, and Whose Fact or Fiction is It?
» Jaelyn
» In the Rathole
» My life on the Quay
» I Miss You

Rating

Teen



Comments / Feedback

BW
August 19, 2008, 23:13

Great observations, Korski. Here in Farangland, USA, the women are no different. In fact, I have more respect for the hookers because they will at least hold up their end of the bargain for the money that they take. Get married and the price for sex increases about 20-50 times, while the quality and duration decreases dramatically.
korski
August 20, 2008, 06:37

Spot on your observations about getting married in Farangland. The most expensive pussy in the world, and in the great majority of marriages not only does boredom set in with time but the cost of the sex rises per session--the courts guarantee this, and of course the wife plays her role too; she just loses interest or has other things on her mind--kids, a new SUV, more cell phones. Of course, these observations by you, and these few notes by me, greatly infuriate those who "claim" to be in deeply satisfying long-term relationships. I'm delighted for those when this really is the case. Humans are notable for self-deception.
steve rosse
August 20, 2008, 08:34

Sour grapes.
Marc Holt
August 20, 2008, 09:30

All marriages, east or west, have their problems. The sex decreases, especially when the kids come along. Women wonder why men stray or give up on their marriages. But they rarely ask themselves if it is their fault. They let themselves go. Or they are more interested in doing the washing and ironing when the husband feels frisky. So is it any wonder men look elsewhere?

Sure, there are some men who crow loudly (especially one on a forum we know) that they are so happily married. Really? I seriously doubt it. One of main reasons men stay in an unhappy marriage is to stay with their kids. Unfortunately, too many women don't give a damn, kick the husband out and then selfishly claim the right to look after the kids on their own....with child support of course! Weekly visits? What a sham and a shame!

Is it any wonder so many men end up washed up on Thailand's shores desperately seeking a little love and comfort, even if they have to pay for it? Women's Lib has a lot to answer for. At least in our grandparent's day they stuck it out because they took a vow. Today a marriage promise isn't worth the paper it is written on if the woman decides she wants 'better'.
korski
August 20, 2008, 10:36

Sour grapes? Statistics say otherwise. The divorce rate is 50% in America, higher in Europe. And my guess is that of the remaining 50% a very good proportion of the rest stay in marriages because of kids, and because of the economics--divorce is an easy way to get poor very fast. Loveless and sexless marriages, for those who stay in them--a great many, at any rate. Marc addresses many of the issues. I think we need to make a distinction between reality and what we would all like, and what we would all like leads many to labeling the messenger of reality as someone pushing a large cart full of sour grapes.
rob
August 20, 2008, 18:14

Boredom sets in in marriage, that's true - but butterflying can also be boring. It's nice to have both - but very hard to manage. And there are times when it's good to take a break from women altogether, and just enjoy them by proxy by reading Thailandstories.
steve rosse
August 20, 2008, 19:01

Come on, you guys. You can walk into any beer bar in Southeast Asia and on the next stool is some fat, self-centered, insensitive, cheap bastard whining about how feminism ruined his marriage. Maybe if he'd washed his feet in the shower his wife wouldn't have left him, but he'll talk for hours about how it's everybody's fault but his own. Then he starts telling you about "how these Thai hookers really think." Please. Let's try to lift the level of the conversation here, okay?
korski
August 21, 2008, 08:56

Steve, you're quite right. Thai hookers don't think, and anyone who thinks so was born yesterday. But Butterflies don't get in bed with hookers because they know that Africa is not a country in northern Europe. They're there for the pure and marvelous pleasure of young and delicious pussy that is very cheap indeed. As for the "self-centered, insensitive, cheap bastard whining about how feminism..."--yep you're right again. But this has nothing to do with how expensive pussy is in the West or how little ass you get in a long-term relationship, or how expensive it is to get out of a Western marriage. All you're commenting on is the genuine loser subset of this group that stinks and is fat and is always grousing about others putting them where they are. I think it's pretty obvious that on the whole--with some obvious exceptions--expats in SEA are a huge parking lot of losers. As for butterfly mongers--some are in this category, some aren't. The worst that can be said about them by a fem--and this doesn't amount to a ****--is that they're sex addicts. To which they would gleefully agree.







Dana
August 22, 2008, 20:56

"Let's try to lift the level of the conversation here, okay?"

Good idea. You first.
steve rosse
August 23, 2008, 01:22

"Good idea. You first."

How about we agree to confine our contributions to honest efforts at serious writing, and avoid any essays that can be boiled down to "I'm a sad and lonely guy who's made questionable choices about how I spend my time and money but I'm validated because you made the same questionable choices." How about that? No more bragging about how often we pay for sex, no more bashing women, certainly no more bashing Thai people. No more provocative rants and adolescent posturing. No more "experts" who base their conclusions on a few days in a Pattaya motel room. No more pseudo-academic "research papers" from guys who wouldn't know a footnote from a football. No more "Look at ME! Listen to ME! Pay attention to ME!" No more first drafts; nothing posted until the author has read and edited his own work. Just serious efforts at writing and constructive criticism aimed at improving our writing skills. Any takers?
NAJ
August 23, 2008, 19:58

What's interesting about this story is the author has his actions completely justified in his mind about the cause of his behavior being "chemicals". Let's blame all our behavior on chemicals and not the choices we make seems to be the normal thinking of a "monger" or "butterfly". I did this or that because of the chemicals in my brain. Therefore i am not responsible for my actions. I guess this line of thinking opened the door to "pleading insanity" in some courts. One of the most ridiculous additives to an already seriously flawed system. How about taking responsibility for your actions for a change? Same goes for the hookers.
a bloody yank
August 24, 2008, 07:31

If it flys, floats or phucks, it is cheaper to rent than to own.

Paid for pussy is almost always cheaper than free pussy.
However, I disagree somewhat, on your belief in always telling bargirls you are not a butterfly. I sometimes make a point of telling them I am a butterfly to prevent any possessiveness. This works for me whenever I make the decision to use it.
korski
August 25, 2008, 07:27

Steve. Guess I don't fit within your model of what should be written and posted. Don't know what I'm talking about, only been to Pattaya for a few days, don't know how to write, notorious for posting pseudo-academic research papers...hum. But I plead that I am not a sad and lonely guy, and I don't think I've been bragging about how often I pay for sex (fact is have never admitted paying for it), and I'm certainly not aware that I bash the Thais or even hookers for that matter, though I am not reluctant to point out how they behave. But then maybe you had someone else in mind?
RSS 2.0: Syndicate this article

Add Comment
* Name


Site



*Image Validation (?)


*Comments / Feedback





Print Article Print Article
Send to a friend Send to a friend
Save as PDF Save as PDF
Rate this Article :

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10
Poor Excellent