Careful What You Wish For

By : Steve Rosse
Views : 581

I've decided, after years of complaining that Bangkok combines the worst aspects of Calcutta and Omaha, that maybe the City of Angels isn’t so bad. The revelation came during my last visit to the capitol, when I undertook the obligatory trip to Patpong Road that all men have to make so that their friends won’t think they’re gay.

It was my last night in the big city and I had found everything on my wife Mem's shopping list in two fairly painless hours at Burnsogood Department Store. I crossed Sukhumvit, found a wobbly table outside a bar called Flagrante Dilecto and dropped my bags and my butt onto a pair of sticky cafe chairs. I ordered a beer, lit a cigarette and leaned back in my chair. I decided long ago that I would only enter a Patpong bar when I found one where beautiful, young Asian women buy drinks for fat, middle-aged foreign men, so I tend to spend all of my time out on the street.

I was prepared to be shocked, as I usually am, by the seediness of the night life on Patpong, and just as prepared to feel all smug and superior about it too. But with the clarity of vision that comes with seeing a familiar scene after a long absence, the first thing I noticed was the cleanliness. The street was swept, the vendors' stalls were arranged in neat, orderly rows with plenty of room left for foot traffic, and there were no offensive odors. In fact, the whole street smelled like floral air-freshener. It smelled like an airport men's room.

In Phuket we have two main red-light districts: Patong Beach for the tourists and Poonporn Road for the locals. In both places it is common to see rats running along the gutters and mangy dogs digging in the piles of garbage on the street corners. In the Patpong I saw last week there were no piles of garbage evident, no mangy dogs, and the only rats were the toy kind that run around on the end of a string.

The touts hanging around seemed to be in a playful mood, and not at all threatening. I saw one of them walking purposefully down the street counting a fistful of US$ 50 bills. The meanest, baddest mofo in New York wouldn't dare do that on Times Square. The tourists, while they looked as goofy as ever, appeared to be having a good time, and didn't appear to miss Happy Hour at all. I saw one lady tourist enter a go-go bar alone, something she never would have done in the strip clubs of Atlantic City, New Jersey.

I noticed that even the air was noticeably cleaner than the first time I came to Bangkok in 1969. This may have been due to some unseasonable winds or the reduced traffic over the long ASEM weekend, but I like to think that it's a result of the un-leaded gasoline that Anand Panyarachun introduced to the city in 1992. His was the same administration that declared that my son could be a Thai citizen even though his great-grandfather was Lithuanian, so now Andy can go to school with the other Thai kids whose great-grandfathers were Chinese or Indian or Malay.

Some things have remained the same, of course. Just as on that first visit, the most attractive woman I saw on Patpong last week was dressed in Levi's and a T-shirt, selling fake Rolex watches in the middle of the road. And here's an old joke: What's the difference between Jews and canoes? Canoes tip. I still get the same dirty looks from taxi drivers and waitresses that I always have.

And what was most easily felt as I sat and smoked and rubbed my aching feet and watched life's passing parade was that Bangkok enjoys an energy that my beloved Phuket does not, and most likely never will. It's an energy that only exists in big, vibrant, dirty, dangerous cities, an energy that I can clearly remember enjoying immensely as a young man in New York. There were no Muslim fishermen mending their nets on Patpong Road that night, no gangs of happy villagers singing the songs their ancestors did as they pick rice in fields that their ancestors carved from the jungle, no country bumpkins in sarongs and sun-faded shirts telling dirty jokes in southern slang and laughing around a mouthful of betel nut pulp.

The people on Patpong were all well dressed and almost all of them quite young. Even the ones who spend all night standing on one spot of pavement appeared to be in a hurry. Every single person on the street had the sum total of their abilities focused like a dental laser on a well defined goal. Granted, that goal was totally unenlightened self-interest, but nobody ever said Patpong was Historic Williamsburg and nobody sells it that way. They used to sell Disneyland as an educational experience, which is just as sleazy a tactic as any of the menus for the "upstairs" shows at Patpong.

I returned to Phuket 48 hours ago, and except for three minutes of almost unbearable pain in my sinuses as the plane descended over the airport, nothing about my trip was as memorable as that feeling of raw human energy I felt on Patpong.

I'm writing this column in my office, which is a narrow, windowless room fifty meters from the beach. I write on a lap-top, which despite having been twice pried open and "serviced" by a clutch of grinning monkeys with tool kits full of magic beans and gecko bones, still has enough battery capacity for two hours' labour without external power. This means that I could go work on the beach. But after almost a decade on the island of lost souls, last Christmas I asked Santa Claus for an air-conditioned office, and I got my wish. Now I only see the beach out of my car window as I drive home.

A moment ago my computer belched and dumped two paragraphs of text. I cursed those grinning monkeys with their technical school diplomas and island-wide monopoly on computer repair, and wished for the N-th time that I lived someplace where people actually delivered what they advertised. Thoreau eventually left Walden Pond, and Gauguin left Tahiti. If I'm beginning to enjoy myself in Bangkok, I'd better be careful what I wish for.

 

© Steve Rosse. All rights reserved by the author. 

----------------------------
If you enjoyed this short story of Steve Rosse's  you can easily purchase his book 'Thai Vignettes' online here at Bangkok Books.com: http://www.bangkokbooks.com/php/product/product.php?product_id=000025&sub_cate_name=&sub_cate_id=

Most books published by Bangkok Book House are available at Asia Books, Bookazine, B2S, Kinokuniya, Suriwong Chiang Mai, DK Chiang Mai, Pattaya, Lampang; all airports, many hotel outlets, supermarkets (Villa, Friendship Pattaya), The Books (Phuket, Krabi), Singapore including airport, Hong Kong airport and many smaller independent outlets throughout Thailand (www.bangkokbooks.com).


Like this story? Share it with others: Stumble It! Add to Yahoo! My Web Bookmark to Del.icio.us Bookmark to Furl Spurl This! Add to Reddit Bookmark to Newsvine


Related Articles

» Thai Vignettes - by Steve Rosse - Chapter 1
» Expat Days - by Steve Rosse - Chapter 1
» Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
» Terror at 30,000 Feet
» The Gambler
» The Scarlet Claw
» Sleepless in Seattle
» His Gal Friday
» Good References
» The Artist
» Rain
» The Days of Wine and Roses
» The Greatest Show on Earth
» Talking Trash
» The Quiet Man
» Videodrome
» Speaking in Tongues
» True Life Crime Stories
» Miss Manners
» Dirty Dancing
» Author! Author!
» Fashion victims – October
» Playing with Fire
» The Crooked Houses
» The Dream Merchants
» The Out of Towners
» Things to Come
» When Worlds Collide
» SACRED COWS - Icons of travel writing
» A Member of the Wedding
» Out of Africa
» An Oriental Romance
» Face value
» Down to the Sea in Ships
» A Room of One's Own
» Tart of Darkness
» Between Then and Now
» Between “Then and Now” and Now - An Author Comments
» Fan Mail
» Papa
» The List

Rating

PG



Comments / Feedback

Dana
September 30, 2008, 21:42

"I undertook the obligatory trip to Patpong Road that all men have to make so that their friends won’t think they’re gay."

An example of too clever writing that just ends up looking silly. There are men who like women. They do not have to defend themselves or pose.

Other than that small point I thought this was a nice read and a good example of Mr. Rosse at his Mr. Rosse best.
Fanta
October 1, 2008, 14:29

"I crossed Sukhumvit, found a wobbly table outside a bar called Flagrante Dilecto and dropped my bags and my butt onto a pair of sticky cafe chairs"

Steve, since your story is 'about' Patpong, should that read "Silom" rather than "Sukhumwit" and if so....?
Rob Carry
October 1, 2008, 15:41

Excellent, excellent stuff. Some really well crafted descriptions in there. I agree with Dana though - I could see what you were trying to do with the second sentence, but I wasn't crazy about it.
steve rosse
October 1, 2008, 18:26

"...so that their friends won’t think they’re gay." Yeah, again, that's the artificial voice calculated to provoke a response. Almost 20 years later, even I'm not crazy about it, mostly because it derides gay men.

""I crossed Sukhumvit..." I've probably only spent 10 days of my life in Bangkok, and my geography aint so good. Maybe it was Soi Cowboy? I know it wasn't Nana.
korski
October 2, 2008, 10:03

I've decided, after years of complaining that Bangkok combines the worst aspects of Calcutta and Omaha, that maybe the City of Angels isn’t so bad.

Quite an exaggeration and quite apart from this admission of having spent ten days or so at most in Bangkok! Come on Steve, get credible.
steve rosse
October 2, 2008, 18:28

"Come on Steve, get credible." Huh? You've lost me, Dude. I can't form an opinion of a city in less than 10 days? Why not? And yeah, it's exaggeration to make a point. It's technique. The line is a joke, it's supposed to be a wry juxtaposition of Calcutta and Omaha. It's that provocative voice that made all the punters on Soi Cowboy get up early on Sunday mornings because they just loved to get furious at Steve Rosse. It's teasing the monkeys. Try not to take everything so literally.
Rob Carry
October 2, 2008, 20:28

'Quite an exaggeration and quite apart from this admission of having spent ten days or so at most in Bangkok! Come on Steve, get credible.'

The 'Calcutta and Omaha' comparison is clearly tongue-in-cheek. Either way, the author isn't saying anything definitive about the city - he's clearly trying to make up his mind about it and is basically thinking out loud. An extended stay isn't a prerequisite for this type of personal view-type description. You can give a credible account of what you thought of a place after your first five minutes there.
korski
October 3, 2008, 10:28

You can give a credible account of what you thought of a place after your first five minutes there.

No, you can't. That's faking, bluffing, making someone who has been to Omaha and Calcutta guffaw, laugh in derision. Think you a buffoon. Even fiction needs its credible moments, unless of course you set the fantasy in the opening premises. The problem here is that one feels that the author has not been out of his little room, and it's the worst kind of bluff that doesn't take in a traveler, anyone willing, in fact, to buy into a good story. We all think out loud: just don't call it good fiction, or anything else that finds its way onto paper.
Fanta
October 3, 2008, 16:07

Actually Steve, it surprised me the error was there, primarily because of what you have said previously about the need for authors to thoroughly proof read for factual errors that which they intend to present to their readership, and how not doing so was an insult to readers enough to make you stop reading. All good points, so I was surprised that you let this one through. Claiming to have walked across Sukhumwit to get to Patpong is about as basic a geographical mistake/slip as one could make in Thailand themed stories. However, I still read through and enjoyed the story and thank you for it.
Rob Carry
October 3, 2008, 17:36

"You can give a credible account of what you thought of a place after your first five minutes there."

"No, you can't."

I agree that you can't give a credible account of a place like Bangkok after your first five minutes. That however, is not the same thing as giving an account of what you thought of your first five minutes in Bangkok. The latter is perfectly doable.

The author is not claiming to be an authority on the city here - he's talking about how after his clearly stated limited experience his view of Bangkok is changing and developing. I really can't understand how anyone can read the above article and suggest then that it shouldn't have found its way onto paper. We do all think out loud. The difference is that there's very few among us who could put in on paper with the type of craft shown above. Some of the descriptions given are fantastic. This for example:

"country bumpkins in sarongs and sun-faded shirts telling dirty jokes in southern slang and laughing around a mouthful of betel nut pulp."

You read that line and these people are standing in front of you. I reckon I'll be a long time writing before I come up with something like that.

In my view, basically, there's nothing wrong with thought pieces once they don't claim to be a definitive account and, of course, they're well-written.
Fanta
October 3, 2008, 20:36

This:

"I was prepared to be shocked, as I usually am, by the seediness of the night life on Patpong, and just as prepared to feel all smug and superior about it too."

Does not gibe with this:

"I've probably only spent 10 days of my life in Bangkok, and my geography aint so good. Maybe it was Soi Cowboy? I know it wasn't Nana."

Does the dissonance between the two passages matter in this context? In a way yes, because the smugness and superiority referred to now have only an imaginary object and the "shocked as I usually am" turns out to be a shock from an imagined rather than actual duration and perhaps place. I think that's a good example of why Steve has impressed upon all people the absolute necessity of strict proof-reading as a mark of respect to readers.
steve rosse
October 3, 2008, 22:52

"proof-reading as a mark of respect to readers." I would imagine that the copy editors at The Nation caught this and corrected it for publication. Some day I will go down in the basement and dig out the old hard copies and check, if you like. In the meantime I can only again cite haste (writing a weekly column sometimes required sending first draft to the paper) and unfamiliarity with Bangkok as my excuses. But remember that most of my readers didn't know Sukhumvit from Silom. Most were reading in Lampang or Surat Thani or Phuket. Many of them were not even reading the paper in Thailand, they were reading it on a Thai Airways jet sitting on the runway in Paris or New York or Los Angeles. And if any reader is paying attention to street names, well, then the column has bigger problems.
Dana
October 4, 2008, 03:42

Someone needs to persuade Fanta to make contributions to this website. He is as smart as he thinks he is and the 2nd smartest person I know.
korski
October 4, 2008, 05:10

"Does the dissonance between the two passages matter in this context? In a way yes, because the smugness and superiority referred to now have only an imaginary object and the "shocked as I usually am" turns out to be a shock from an imagined rather than actual duration and perhaps place. I think that's a good example of why Steve has impressed upon all people the absolute necessity of strict proof-reading as a mark of respect to readers."

These kinds of problems point to a somewhat different kind of proof reading, one that deals with logic, and credibility given the premises of the story. Take as a further example the following sentence in the story:

The touts hanging around seemed to be in a playful mood, and not at all threatening. I saw one of them walking purposefully down the street counting a fistful of US$ 50 bills.

It is theoretically possible to see something like this in Bangkok, just highly improbable. The problem is threefold: someone flashing their money, flashing that much--Thai don't have unless drug dealers; and the more serious problem is that I would venture there are very very few 50s around on a day or two day basis in Patpong to make it possible to have a fistful of them. Credible to me: no.
Fanta
October 4, 2008, 09:54

Can the presence today and here of a glaring factual error be legitimately attributed to what was or what was not done by the Nation’s copy editors almost a decade ago? To think so would be an abdication of authorial responsibility for what is presented to Thailandstories readers.

I would think that upwards of 80% of the Nation’s readers are in Bangkok. Do you mean to say that you are specifically writing for those who are not and who, therefore, would be unable to identify mistakes of place made by the author? I think that’s pretty strange as statement and action.
steve rosse
October 4, 2008, 10:01

"He is as smart as he thinks he is and the 2nd smartest person I know." Now you're really scaring me. Did they put you on lithium? Did you fall in love? Win the lottery? Or are you setting us up, lulling us into a false sense of security until we drop our guard and then WHAM! the old Dana leaps out with trannie-guns ablazin'?
A reader
October 4, 2008, 18:53

Personally i do love fiction that makes sure facts are accurate, say novels by Tom Wolfe or early John Updike. As for non-fiction, facts of course must be accurate. A journalistic attitude like „ah, the reader in his armchair won’t notice (errors or contradictions in my text)“ doesn’t impress.
Dana
October 4, 2008, 21:10

"I saw one of them walking purposefully down the street counting a fistful of US$ 50 bills."

I must side with Mr. Korski in questioning the veracity of this statement. Although possible it is not probable for many reasons. That is why in my writing I just stick to facts that can be verified by three sources and I never resort to cheap tricks like hyperbole or exaggeration to attract the reader. Your standard peer reviewed essay monograph in Scientific American magazine and my writing are indistinguishable by design.
korski
October 4, 2008, 22:47

"That is why in my writing I just stick to facts that can be verified by three sources and I never resort to cheap tricks like hyperbole or exaggeration to attract the reader. Your standard peer reviewed essay monograph in Scientific American magazine and my writing are indistinguishable by design."

Oh, man, Dana, you made my day! Now it's time to turn to my stash and my lovely little pink and green bong. :)

steve rosse
October 5, 2008, 11:17

You're right guys. You caught me. I lied about the whole thing. Twelve years ago I made up a story about sitting thoughtfully on a plastic stool on the street because I knew that in the future it would be just super important to me that you guys think my life is exciting. And for sure there's no reason on earth why a bar owner might send an errand boy down the street with four or five hundred dollars. Bar owners never need to buy a half-dozen extra kegs of beer on a busy high season night. It could never happen.

korski
October 6, 2008, 10:37

Steve: Pathetic.
RSS 2.0: Syndicate this article

Add Comment
* Name


Site



*Image Validation (?)


*Comments / Feedback





Print Article Print Article
Send to a friend Send to a friend
Save as PDF Save as PDF
Rate this Article :

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10
Poor Excellent