A Time Criminal

By : Dana
Views : 342

Are you like me? Do you wish you had been born gay so that you could spend your vacation days in the Kingdom on the north end of Jomtien beach being propositioned by guys who don't even pretend to lisp or put their hands on their hips? Standing in the ocean with the water up to your belly button and the sun on your shoulders and on your back and on your head. A Thai man is standing with you chest to chest and his back to the horizon so that no one can see him from the beach. His breath smells like fish paste and one of his hands is in your bathing suit. Ah bliss. You start to giggle, then get dizzy, then . . . instead, I'm stuck with women.

Women, what's with that? Whose idea of a joke was that? Which god takes the blame for this? Women. I commute every day on the subway in Boston. Never once have I seen a woman reading the newspaper. Think that is hyperbole? Let me repeat: never once have I seen a woman reading the newspaper. And now with cell phones and cell phone culture? Forget about it. We have newspapers for every enthusiasm in Boston but women don't have any enthusiasms that are not self-centric. Daily newspaper reading allows people to keep in touch with local, regional, national, Earthly, solar system, Milky Way, or cosmic events. But women are not interested in local, regional, national, Earthly, solar system, Milky Way, or cosmic events. Facts or speculations on issues or events not 100% all about them simply do not qualify as interesting data. Boys, babies, make-up, and dress-up are the four parts of a woman's brain. Oh sure, in the more complicated womens' brains you might have secondary parts like diet, celebrity sightings, and alimony payments but how about science, philosophy, sports, history, current events, first principles, cosmology, morals, physics, material sciences, engineering, and politics? Forget about it. Boys, babies, make-up, and dress-up. And in Thailand it's boys, babies, make-up, dress-up, and cheating foreign men.

The diet of the sperm whale is mostly squid. The squid live deep, one to three thousand feet deep in many cases. Sometimes even deeper. Much deeper. Imagine the pressure. Imagine the complete lack of light. The slow ponderous whales can't see. The squid are acrobatically fast and maneuverable. So how do the eighty foot sperm whales catch the hundreds of thousands to millions of squid that they need to catch to live? 3% of their body weight per day? Do the numbers. Squid are 89% of their diet and these big boys need squid in volume daily. Nobody has a clue. Not one scientist even has a theory worth considering. A complete mystery. Not one smartipants Phd. whale expert has been able to crack the code on this: how the whales catch enough squid. An interesting question isn't it? Not to females. All they care about is boys, babies, make-up, and dress-up. Brainless hormone machines put on Earth to grunt out more babies we don't need. And three holes in one place? Oh please, give me a break. Is it any wonder they walk around with perfumed underpants? Peeing, pooping, farting, bleeding all in one place? What man would have designed something like that? Have you ever seen a bridge design that messed up? Sweet Jesus on a cracker, whose idea was this? Tip a man's balls and flip a can of talcum powder at him and 'no ploblum kind sir'. Women? Forget about it. But I almost digress: at least if I was gay in Thailand I'd have someone to talk to. A man can dream.

The biomass of krill may exceed E.O.Wilson's ants. And the biomass of squid may exceed that of krill. In fact, it is possible that the biomass of squid exceeds all other individual biomasses on Earth. But that does not explain how sperm whales find, pursue, and swallow squid. With depth deflated lungs they are not suddenly going to become more athletic. In depths without light they do not have a way to generate light. They do not appear to have the needed echo locating type radar to make them top predators. In fact, they do not even have eyes on the front of their head which is a marker of land predators and whales are mammals. And their eyes are so small as to look like afterthoughts. One of the best representations of a sperm whale by artist Rockwell Kent (Rockwell Kent Gallery and Collection, Plattsburgh State Art Museum) does not even have eyes. No one corrected him. And just as interesting, though less dramatic; is Barry Moser's now iconic illustration of a sperm whale in his 1978 illustrated edition of Moby Dick. The whale has an eye of such indeterminate portraiture that you have to strain to see it and then you have to convince yourself that you are indeed looking at the eye of the monster. How did these great lumbering blind-at-depth beasts feed themselves? Is it possible that there are some areas of squid biomass so conjested that all whales had to do was swim around with their lower jaw open? Etc. Etc. A scientific puzzler and it is precisely this kind of problem solving that is supposed to be a marker of higher intelligence. We ought to be able to figure this out. This should get the curious person's (read: homosapien) attention. Try it on women. Good luck. You'll get responses like:

"You talk too mutt."

"You talk funny."

"My last boyfriend was boring too."

Women are not curious. At least with gays, faggots, and homos you can have a conversation. In fact, they may even know something about homosexual sperm whales. I mean, look at the name: sperm whale. At any rate, if you are ever in a bar in Pattaya and you look to your right or you look to your left and you see an eighty foot sperm whale sitting next to you, ask him about this stuff. I'd like to know.

You know, one theory of mine about how sperm whales manage to ingest enough squid biomass to live is that they do not predate at all. Instead, they dive down to Squid Clinics for the Depressed and the squid just swim in their jaws and commit suicide. Seem silly? Ok Einstein, what's your big idea? Do you know why previously I did not say 'find, pursue, bite, and swallow'? Because there are no bite marks on most of the squid found in sperm whale stomachs. So they are top predators that usually do not have to even bite their prey? Really? And while you are composing your patronizing email to me consider this: can you imagine having this conversation with a Thai woman? Hence my theory that most men would be a lot happier as gays, faggots, and homos. Also fruit loops, limp wrists, and 'light-in-the-loafers' but those are subcategories and not for this essay.

Ever been in a Pakistani bar during cricket finals? How about an English bar during soccer finals, or an Australian bar during . . . well, just any Aussie bar anytime. These guys are having fun. At least I think the Aussies are having fun. Can not understand one word. At any rate, as fun as these straight bars are; nothing equals the fun and happiness and hilarity of a fag bar for foreigners in Pattaya. Guys a thousand miles from home with big needy wing wangs, plenty of money, and if you run into your boss from back home that's not a problem, it's an opportunity. They don't always let me in a gay bar in Pattaya but when they do everyone is nice to me. They know two things. They know that I am straight, and they know that I am not judgemental. If you have ever held up tranny Emma's twelve inchs with a stick it broadens your horizons. Want to have some fun? Balance a tongue depressor on a bar of soap and put an M&M candy on one end. Then have tranny Emma slam her log down on the other end and try to catch the flying M&M candy in your mouth. Now that's what I call Thai culture. Anyway, it is hard to exceed the fun to be had in gay bars.

Yesterday I picked up Fa at 9:15 in the morning, Ting at 2:30 in the afternoon, and Mem (or was it Lem) off the boardwalk at 10:00 p.m. I'm straight. It's what I do. But it is mostly a yawn being an adonis macho alpha male because I am forced to consort with women. If I could speak perfect Thai would these women be able to talk about anything besides boys, babies, make-up, dress-up, and cheating foreign men? If there was a subway running from Jomtien to Chonburi would I see any of these Thai femme fatales reading a newspaper? I'll bet you if the subway was full of homos you'd see newspapers. Just thinkin'.

What has the most value? Is it love or diamonds or land or health or power? None of these things has the most value. What has the most value is time. You can never get time back. Everything about your life is linear. Time only goes forward and it can't be stopped, slowed, or reversed. Time wasted is the biggest crime.

"Yesterday I picked up Fa at 9:15 in the morning, Ting at 2:30 in the afternoon, and Mem (or was it Lem) off the boardwalk at 10:00 p.m."

God, what a heterosexual waste of time. A waste of time with women.

"Women? What's with that? Whose idea of a joke was that?"

I wish I was gay. At least then I wouldn't be a time criminal, wasting time and committing a crime against myself.

Are you like me? I'll bet you are. I'll bet you wish you were a homo too. Standing in water up to your waist with the sun on your back, and the sun on your shoulders, and the sun on your head; and a Thai man's hand in your bathing suit.

 

 

© Dana. All rights reserved by the author.


Like this story? Share it with others: Stumble It! Add to Yahoo! My Web Bookmark to Del.icio.us Bookmark to Furl Spurl This! Add to Reddit Bookmark to Newsvine


Rating

Teen



Comments / Feedback

brien
November 14, 2011, 20:12

simply sick
steve rosse
November 14, 2011, 22:21

I think the question here is, "Dana, do you ever wish you were straight?"
Soi "Hair of the Dog"
November 15, 2011, 00:33

Does the Thai education system promote intellectual curiosity – I think not!

I have helped teach English in a number of Thai classrooms, but never once been questioned on the feeding habits of sperm whales. A number of the male students confessed to being aspiring ‘Miss Tiffanies’ and nobody seemed particularly surprised or indeed concerned. An interesting difference between mainstream viewpoints in Thailand and the West where such a statement openly made in the classroom would most likely lead to ridicule and open hostility.

I think perhaps the solution to Dana’s dilemma is to maintain a balanced circle of friends and acquaintances. I recommend women for sex, PHD graduates for theorising on the feeding habits of sperm whales and regular guys for ‘shooting the breeze’ in the bar. Alternatively, if you must have everything from just one individual then try a Western educated, Thai Ladyboy. Good luck and good hunting!
Airmail
November 16, 2011, 05:58

Dana is an agent provocateur. Some people on this site don't realise this. The funny thing is that they're writers.
steve rosse
November 17, 2011, 01:29

@Airmail: Tom, you are misusing the term "agent provocateur" but I think you are trying to say that Dana makes these absurb proclamations in order to provoke a response.

That may be, but when I taunt the mongers, when I poke a stick through the bars at the monkeys at the zoo you say I "must have been bullied in school." Korski rails at my lack of education and others address me by insulting nicknames and encourage me to seek counseling.

So it's okay for Dana to preach sexism and racism in order to stimulate discussion, but when I question the morality and ethics of sex tourism it inspires outrage so violent the admin has to censor most of the responses. And you're all good with that? It fits your sense of right and wrong?
Airmail
November 17, 2011, 15:24

Who the f***k is Tom?

Other than that you're right , that's exactly what I meant. The difference is that when you taunt you actually believe your remarks ; with Dana I'm not sure. I have an inkling that a lot of times he actually means it but he hopes we think he's kidding.
With regard to Thai people and Thailand he had said on other occasions and other sites that Thai people are **** and Thailand is ****. This isn't necessarily racist but it's a personal opinion.
Now one could argue that in this case he should refrain from Thaicentric sites as it could be conceived as a hate campaign. I don't think so. I just think that Dana is wearing his heart on his sleave just like someone else who sees everything Thai with rose coloured glasses.However when it's a positive remark people wouldn't raise an objection. They might just think you're a fool.
Soi "Hair of the Dog"
November 17, 2011, 16:35

Surely it is inevitable and indeed desirable that in a writers' forum such as this, controversial viewpoints will be promoted and discussed. This is a place for free speech and measured response, not political correctness and perceived wisdom.

Dana and others voluntarily sacrifice their time to make entertaining, challenging and sometimes mischievous contributions for the benefit of the readership. Perhaps in turn we should extend to them the courtesy of providing thoughtful rather than abusive responses?

“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it” – The friends of Voltaire (1906).
Mark Twain
November 17, 2011, 20:57

You can call me “Marky”, if you want or you can call me Mark or Farky. Frank or Frankly I don't care I don't have a thing about it.

What would it mean if I did have a thing about? Now that is interesting.

What would it mean if I taunted mongers like Ted Haggard taunted gays? Hmmm, Mohammad on a Matzo, makes you wonder doesn't it.

Steve I share your abhorrence with censorship of any kind.

No one ever asks my opinion but if they did I would tell them, go ahead and let me have both barrels but be prepared for a response.

I know a man who knew a man who met Dana one time across the mall from the restroom in Pattaya.

I know it is dangerous for a straight guy dressed in black pants, white polyester short sleeved shirt with tie wearing athletic shoes and carrying a brief case to go into a restroom in Thailand. Apparently this is some kind of gay code thing.

The man who knew a man who met Dana one time across the mall from the restroom in Pattaya told Dana all about the dangers of going to a restroom in Thailand and really I don't know why Dana set his brilliant piece of prose featuring a gay encounter in the ocean instead of a toilet. Nor do I know why he failed to mention the number one topic of Thai female thought and speech, FOOD.

I would write more but I'll wait and see if my short note has violated some cultural taboo before continuing.

Louis P. Christopher
November 17, 2011, 21:44

Some seriously misogynistic stuff here, Dana. But then you already know that because that was your point... and I must admit you did a good job of it and were even clever here an there along the way... and, as per usual, it's well written...

One thing at a time...

"...women are not interested in local, regional, national, Earthly, solar system, Milky Way, or cosmic events. Facts or speculations on issues or events not 100% all about them simply do not qualify as interesting data. Boys, babies, make-up, and dress-up are the four parts of a woman's brain. Oh sure, in the more complicated womens' brains you might have secondary parts like diet, celebrity sightings, and alimony payments but how about science, philosophy, sports, history, current events, first principles, cosmology, morals, physics, material sciences, engineering, and politics? Forget about it."

That women do not interest themselves in any of the above would I suspect come as a pretty big surprise to women the world over who are historians, journalists, scientists, engineers, politicians, astronomers, physicists, etc. and so on.

But again, I know that you actually know that. How do I know? Well, because having read some of your stuff, I know you're not stupid or uninformed and that you read.

Race and racism came up and you decided to put a piece up that was egregiously sexist and see what followed. I actually appreciate the effort... and as I said, it is well written and clever. The Sperm Whale with all the factoids thereafter... clever choice (and perhaps even a bit of research to send the point home)! Kudos.

You then give it up to homosexuals, make it clear that while you are hetero, you are not completely homophobic, and then come back to a paragraph which confirms your heterosexuality because you shagged three women in a day. And then, here is the clincher, you bring it back to a piece somehow about a more universal issue: TIME (though I think this is where you were least successful... )

I do not advocate censoring pieces or comments on this site. There are heaps of literary sites on the net in which a particular piece is subject to an editorial process and either accepted or rejected based on any number of issues ranging from content to quality to grammar, etc.

I know that the mods of this site do decide, from time to time, not to post pieces or comments that they feel have pushed the envelope too far. And I appreciate that they let a lot slide, in the order to allow for conversation.

But, as I began, and as I commented on a recent piece which I agreed with some posters was straight up racist (Mark Twain, if you are reading, please refer to a dictionary as to the words "race" and "racist" and also consider common usage), despite your being clever, some serious misinformed misogynistic generalizing here.

But again, I know you know that.
Dana
November 18, 2011, 01:18

"Nor do I know why he failed to mention the number one topic of Thai female thought and speech, FOOD."

A worthy criticism. Now I will have to figure out who to blame. I really should have remembered this. Rarely do I have to deal with myself making a mistake. This is very painful for me. Since the inclusion of FOOD is so transparently obvious and my not mentioning it is so attention getting I suppose it is only a matter of time before I am accused of being a FOOD racist or something. Or maybe a FOOD misogynist. Yeah, that sounds better.

Dana
November 18, 2011, 06:47

" . . . serious misinformed misogynistic generalizing . . . "

Somebody, not me, I am too busy being racist and misogynistic: should do a ten thousand word monograph on the misuse of the word misogynist. We men have now reached a stage of evolution (or not) whereby we have bought the notion that 50% of the world's population can not be criticized as a group or as individuals because of their gender. Logically this should offend us but apparently we are now so stupid that we are beyond logic also. And men calling other men misoygnists inaccurately is just pathetic. The 19 year old Israeli backpacker with the salad bowl breasts is not going to go to bed with you because you call me names. She is smarter than you are. Everything men do or say is to attract females. You are calling me names to attract women? I think you need to regroup.

Finally, I live in Boston in the heart of the monster. Parallel parking only. And I can tell you from 27 years of observation that women can not parallel park. Apparently, this observation makes me a misogynist. What? Silly. One begins to wonder if any observation or comment at all from a man regarding women is not misogynistic.

For example: I have observed that all women have breasts. Does this make me an automatic misogynist because I am a male making an observation about females? Seems stupid? Yes, it seems stupid to me also, but more and more I am becoming persuaded that this is where we are now.
Mark Twain
November 18, 2011, 09:48

Race and racist and common usage. OK, check.

When people want to make a bad remark seem worse they raise the ante of the pejorative word used to describe the behavior. For example when I was a young man of 50 I lived with a 19 year old stripper from Louisiana. Her 25 year old boyfriend called me a Pedo because of our 31 year age difference.

When someone makes an anti nationalist statement it sounds worse to refer to it as racist. When expat information moved from bar to INTERNET it was only a matter of time before raging homosexuals and militant feminists (I use those terms only as an example of what I am talking about from the other side) began to take over websites and enforce their world view on the unsuspecting majority.

Reading statistics put forward as fact by NGO's trying to Westernize Thailand one runs into the same amount of intellectual trash and dummy statistics.

I prefer to read personal experiences rather than stereotypic rants and generalized fluffy PC comments.

Last night we had a funeral for my gold fish of three years residence in my home. A group of college educated and multinational employed female engineers lit incense and prayed (seriously) for the release of the spirit of my departed fish so no gold fish ghosts would hang around my condo.

Then we watched some Japanese BBW porn (I have a machine that removes the pixelation) and went to bed.

It may be common usage to refer to Thais as a race but that makes as much sense as referring to Australians as a race.

I would prefer to disagree with the comment that Thais are stupid rather than attacking the holder of that opinion with a PC slap about racism. It would be much closer to reality looking at recent history from 1932 onward to say that Thais are smart.

Most families in the West have someone that died as a result of WW II, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and so on. One is hard pressed to find a Thai family that has ever been effected by war except to make money. My current squeeze went to the leading technical university in Thailand specializing in heavy equipment. That school still has American equipment left over from the Vietnam war and their OJT was magnificent as a result. The same thing can be said about model T powered tanks that won the Franco/Thai war in 1940. I could go on and on but the Thais have conducted themselves brilliantly on the stage of diplomacy and warfare for many years. It all can't be luck.
Louis P. Christopher
November 26, 2011, 20:02

Mark, sorry about your gold fish. I tip my 40 to your dead homie.

Yes, I agree that people sometimes "pull the race card" when it isn't appropriate. And this holds true, I think, to "pulling the sexist card." But i don't think that applies here.

You said, "When someone makes an anti nationalist statement it sounds worse to refer to it as racist."

I don't see where that happened in any of the above or the other piece I referred to (...the stupidity of Thais..).

if you're looking for argument from me that a lot of Thai folks are nationalistic to, well, sometimes to the point of being "racist," you will get no argument from my quarter.

But it's now also become popular to pull the "PC card" which i think has been done in this thread and others without any real consideration that to do so is equally as unthoughtful as pulling any other of the above mentioned cards when the statements made don't fit the bill.

I am drinking a beer right now. It is really, really not hot. The word we use in English is "cold." There is a furry mammal at my feet. It's bigger than a cat, tends to make a sometimes make a short loud sound (we call it a "bark") and sometimes a more extended sound (we call that a "howl"). The word we use in English to describe this particular kind of mammal is "dog."

A statement such as "the stupidity of Thais" can appropriately called racist without the person doing so appropriately being called PC.

A piece of writing which suggests that ALL women are so shallow as to be unable to discuss or even think about anything other than shopping and such like (which, let's face it, we all know is bull crap, including Dana)? Well, we have a word for that too, and the appropriate word is "sexist."

Politically correct? I disagree. Just a simple matter of using the words that are used.

I am about to move on to a different beverage. It comes in a bottle. I like on it on ice (unless it's a of a very high quality, in which case I drink it "neat") while other people prefer it with "soda."

It has a name. And I bet you can guess it.


RSS 2.0: Syndicate this article

Add Comment
* Name


Site



*Image Validation (?)


*Comments / Feedback





Print Article Print Article
Send to a friend Send to a friend
Save as PDF Save as PDF