Ex-pat

By : sawadee2000
Views : 590

expat • noun & adjective informal short for expatriate.

expatriate • noun /ekspatri t/ a person who lives outside their native country. origin: Latin expatriare, from patria ‘native country’. Oxford English Dictionary

There are some events during our brief sojourn here on earth that are indelibly etched into our minds. I remember precisely where I was when I first heard that John Fitzgerald Kennedy had been assassinated in Dallas. I was sitting in the library at Crosby Junior High School in Pittsfield Massachusetts attempting to figure out my algebra homework when the principal made the announcement. Even at the age of thirteen, I was worldly enough to understand the full magnitude of what had happened. I may have only been an adolescent, but I was capable of feeling grief, and it was a powerful wave of grief, mixed with fear and stunned disbelief that washed over me that day in November 1963.

Now it was November 2008, and another wave of powerful emotions was sweeping over me. I was sitting in the café across from my school when I heard that Barack Obama had just been elected as the forty-fourth President of the United States of America. The emotional tsunami this time was not one of despair, but one of joy, and I must be honest a sense of relief.

Bye- bye Dubyu! I must also admit that the intensity of my swelling sense of happiness took me by surprise. I was certainly hoping that Obama would be victorious, and I had sent in my absentee ballot. It’s not surprising that like most of the civilized world I was happy to know that Obama would soon be in the Oval Office. Hell, maybe, just maybe our long national nightmare would be over and we could at least begin to regain a sense of purpose not based on fear and jingoistic slogans.

But politics is not what I want to write about today, but rather what it was like to living so far from my former homeland as this momentous event unfolded. America is so many thousands of miles away, and I have only spent a handful of days there in the past four years. I’m now a permanent resident in Thailand, even if my status as one remains in the capricious hands of the Visa Gods. Yes, I am indeed truly an expat.

If truth be told, the word expat doesn’t exactly roll off my tongue. It has a rather unpleasant sound, like the often used word born of the Internet age, blog. Does anyone honestly like the word blog? Blog sounds like some kind of tropical skin disease. To me, expat sounds all too like Ex-lax, a well known laxative in America. (Of course some out there in forumland have accused me of being full of shit, in which case the word might apply to my babblings!)

An expatriate is of course “a person who lives outside their native country”. That pretty much describes me, as well of thousands of other former residents of Farangland. Baring an unforeseen disaster, such as a civil war (which believe me is not out of the question when HRM is no longer among the living) I am likely to remain here until the funeral pyre reduces me to a small pile of ash. Even then I’ve told my wife to put my ashes in the ground and plant a nice tree there. So I plan on sticking around even as some well carbonized fertilizer! Wow! I guess I do like my adopted homeland!

I’ve written often enough about how I came to be living in “The Land of Smiles” and why I’m still here. I certainly did not “run away” from America and I definitely do not feel “trapped” here in Thailand. This is simply where I’ve chosen to spend the last part of life. I’ve been here long enough that Thailand does feel like a second home, although one which constantly makes me shake my head in disbelief much of the time. But although I’m comfortable here, I still think of myself as an American living abroad. While I have happily adopted many Thai customs, my identity is still firmly rooted in the USA….and gladly so I might add. Someone once asked me back in the States if I planned to become a Thai citizen. Since it was a fellow Yankee asking me that question, I could without any fear of repercussions (like getting the crap beat out of me) laugh out loud. My God I laughed so hard that tears were streaming down my face. Become a citizen of Thailand? Now that’s a joke if I ever heard one. Yes, if I was a Lao, or Khmer, or Burmese, that notion of being Thai might hold some appeal. Economically and politically things are so grim in these places that pledging loyalty to a different flag would be a small price to pay for having enough to eat, access to medical care, schools and plenty of material “stuff”. But who, I ask would want to give up their citizenship in a western democracy to become Thai? Not me folks, not in a million years.

Recently someone submitted a piece asking the question, Proud to be Thai? Some of you may not have agreed with the points raised, but I found it difficult to argue with most the points raised.  This is not to say that the vast majority of Thais are not as “good” as anyone back in any corner of Farangland. Most of the many Thais I’ve had the pleasure to meet over the years have treated me quite well. Are there a fair share of bastards, bitches, selfish ingrates (in-laws!) and just plain nasty Thais? You betcha (Sorry for the Palinism) But I think we have all known our share of these sorry specimens of humanity back in Farangland. Of course since many expats spend a disproportionate amount of time in the company of bar girls (and I’m not criticizing a fun time with the ladies), it’s not hard to come to the conclusion that all Thais are lying, black-hearted schemers. Hmmm….though on second thought there are a large number of other “enterprising” Thais who would happily cheat you with a straight face and a big shit-eating grin on their faces. Most of these, at least as far as I’ve experience are in the places where tourists visit. Personally, here in Lampang, aside from “The Monkey” and his cronies I’ve rarely been lied to or cheated. Still, although I know some nice people, I am still bewildered at the inflated sense of Thai pride. To MAD’s list of Thai misconceptions I would like to add: the belief that their “System of Education” is not a complete and utter sham, and that Thailand is a shining “Beacon of Democracy”. Both of these, by any rational standard are demonstrably a load of manure.

But amazingly, even given all those negative aspects of Thai culture, there is still more here that I enjoy than I despise. Others are free to disagree. This is only my personal opinion! I do believe that is possible to have a wonderful life here…..although it may take more than a little bit or work.

Getting back to my train of thought, I could live to be a hundred (wishful thinking) but I will still identify with the country where I was born. For better or worse, I am an American, and proud to be one. (Note to America haters out there: pleas,e you can stop reading this and just read the latest “golden words” from Aha or Bart.) Hell, I would venture to guess that no matter what corner of Farangland we come from, that most of us still think of ourselves as citizens living abroad.....expats.

I would be very interested in hearing how some of you deal with being so far from where you were born and raised. What do you miss (or not miss one bit)? For what it’s worth, here is my short list of things I miss, at least occasionally.

1. seasons: I mean real seasons, not just hot and dry versus hot and wet. I actually like cool weather and even cold weather from time to time. The “cool season” has finally begun, for which I’m profoundly grateful, but it ain’t that cool, and doesn’t last for all that long. My last visit back to the U.S. was last February, and it was great to have a small dose of New England winter. I would have to admit that I don’t miss shoveling snow, and driving roads glazed with ice is enough to induce a severe case of white-knuckled panic. Still there is something to be said for skiing down the slopes on a “mild” winter’s day under a crystal blue sky.

2. books: lots and lots of glorious books! I’ve written about my passion for reading. Thank goodness I brought thousands of books with me to Thailand, because outside of some bookstores in Bangkok, books in English (or other western languages) are few and far between. Of course that’s understandable. Why should Thailand carry books in someone else’s language? And as for public libraries, hell what passes for libraries here have a pitiful selection of books in Thai! I do miss browsing in bookstores. On my rare trips to Bangkok I spend a good part of my time looking through the ones in the Emporium or Siam Paragon.

3. bread: Man might not live by bread alone, but for me at least, I can easily make a fine meal out of a loaf of fresh, crusty slathered in butter and a salad. Folks living in Bangkok or Pattaya have good bakeries. Here in Lampang the bread is simply not worth eating. Whenever I go to Chiang Mai I try to stock up, but alas my freezer is pretty small, and there is still nothing like bread fresh out of the oven. It’s a pity that the French never colonized this place like they did elsewhere in Southeast Asia. At least in Cambodia you can buy fresh baguettes on the street!

4. beef: Yes, I know that eating too much beef is not good for your health, but damn but every once in a while I NEED to have a steak or some roast beef!!! There is no beef to be had here, except if you happen to know a farmer who is slaughtering a cow. Even then, it is likely to tough, stingy and flavorless. The last steak I had was about 8 months ago at the Londoner in Bangkok. It wasn’t cheap, bit it was good!

5. movie theatres: I have been to the movies precisely once since moving to Thailand. This too was in Bangkok at Siam Paragon. Now that was a fine movie going experience. Here was a cinema that was superior to any that I had ever been to in the U.S. Nice comfy seats, a great sound system, fresh buttered popcorn....what else could a movie buff want? I’ve heard that some theatres in Chiang Mai show some films in English, but I’ve never seen one. Thanks to bittorrent, I’m able to download and burn plenty of movies, but watching them on my small screen just doesn’t compare to seeing them at a cinema.

That’s about all the material things I’m missing. What I miss the most is intellectual stimulation. I do have a few close friends here, one American and one Australian with whom I have some great yak-fests with. Thank goodness for them.  I don’t have too many chances to get together with Stick, but when we do we have a wonderful time just talking about almost every subject you can imagine. Thanks also for CNN, BBC, The Discovery Channel, The History Channel and National Geographic. If I had to depend on Thai television for world news I would be clueless about virtually everything. That would be hard because I am a self confessed news “junkie”. “Enquiring minds want to know” reads the byline of a notorious tabloid paper you can find in checkout lines in American supermarkets. Well, I’m not much interesting in alien abductions, Bigfoot sightings or a tortilla that purports to have the face of Jesus on it, but I am genuinely interested in everything from politics to science. This brings me back to where I started this story, Mr. Obama’s election victory. While life here in Thailand is certainly never boring, a part of me still hungers to keep informed about what’s happening back “home” in America. I have no idea when I will have the opportunity to visit there again. It may very well be many years. Until then I will have to be content to sample the American experience vicariously, through a prism that projects everything at a distance. I suppose that’s part of what being an expat is all about.

 

© Sawadee2000. All rights reserved by the author.


Like this story? Share it with others: Stumble It! Add to Yahoo! My Web Bookmark to Del.icio.us Bookmark to Furl Spurl This! Add to Reddit Bookmark to Newsvine


Related Articles

» How It All Began - Part 1
» How it all began - Off to Isaan - Part 2
» How It All Began - Farewell to the Land of Smiles - Part 3
» How it all began - Living in the USA - Part 4
» How it all began - Preparing for the “Big Move”! - Part 5
» How It All Began - The Shit Hits The fan! - Part 7
» How It All Began - Part 6
» How It All Began - Life and death - Part 8
» How It All Began - House Warming Ceremony - Part 9 - The End
» In The Blink Of An Eye
» It's All Relative, Isn't It?
» A Day In The Life
» A Real Thai Soap Opera
» A Tale of Two Thailands
» Let Them Eat Cake!
» Missionary Fever
» So Just How Dangerous Is It Here?
» Life and Death Redux
» Why Do They Hate Us So?
» School Daze - Part 2
» Flotsam and Jetsam
» The Chivas Life
» Volunteer
» Music Soothes the Savage Beast
» Flag Fatigue
» Tip-Toe Through the Thai Alphabet
» Kindergarten
» Thinking “Outside of the Box”
» So why the hell am I here anyway?
» A Real Thai Soap Opera Yet Again!
» Innocence Not Yet Lost
» Loy Krathong
» The Quest

Rating

PG



Comments / Feedback

Rob Carry
December 9, 2008, 18:48

"It’s a pity that the French never colonized this place like they did elsewhere in Southeast Asia!"

I know this was a throwaway comment you didn't mean literally, but I think it's actually a big part of why the Thais are such a proud people. In Ireland where I come from people are cynical about their country and sadly are very down on it a lot of the time. This is despite the fact that we've an economy, standard of living and education system that would outstrip those of the Thais. The difference, to my mind, is that the Irish had 800 years of a colonial ruler telling us we were an inferior race. If a people are told something for long enough some will start to believe it. The Thais dodged their colonial bullet and other than a brief period under the Japanese never had the boot on their kneck. I think the pride the Thais have in their nation, King and culture is a fabulous thing.
steve rosse
December 9, 2008, 21:45

"a brief period under the Japanese" Just a small quibble, but the Thais were never "under" the Japanese. The Thais were the only willing member of the Greater Southeast Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere. Except for a few policemen down in the South, in one small battle fought with hand guns, no Thais were killed by the Japanese. Granted, the Japanese stole everything they could carry when they pulled out, but there was no slaughter, no forced occupation. On the other hand, the Americans killed 4,000 Thai civilians when they bombed Bangkok in August, 1944. That's 4,000 innocent people in a single month. And America was not even at war with Thailand. No war declared by either side. General Hap Arnold was just practicing for Tokyo.
Dana
December 9, 2008, 23:25


The Thais " . . . never had the boot on their neck." Really? I hate to be the dissenter here (I really want to be popular) but I tire of this comic book history.

The Burmese invaded and abused and burned down the capital and STAYED AROUND for a long time. They invaded many times and always successfully. The Japanese treated the Thais like serfs and many Thais died or were abused. The Chinese have their boot on the neck of the Thais financially every single day. And currently in southern Thailand the Muslims have their boot on the neck of the resident Thais and successfully. Comic book history is sold to the Thais and to the rest of the world. Too bad. The facts are more interesting.
_______________________________

And now for something completely different:

from the book With The Old Breed--at Peleliu and Okinawa by E. B. Sledge

"The password always contained the letter L, which the Japanese had difficulty pronouncing the way an American would."

Hey, makes you kinda wonder what the Japanese used for passwords during WWII in Thailand. Nobody on either side could pronounce R's and L's.
BW
December 10, 2008, 00:03

Al-Quaeda, Hamas, and many other terrorist organizations are overjoyed that Obama was elected too. Now we can revisit the vulnerability of the 1990s that enabled the WTC attacks in the first place.
Dana
December 10, 2008, 03:47

",no forced occupation."

This isn't even revisionist history, it is just nuts. The Japanese were occupiers and their record as occupiers in other countries should give rise to doubts. They were also railroad builders using conscripted labor, etc.

The Thais were "under" the Japanese the way a woman is under a rapist. She may be smiling but she'll smile more when he goes away.

", no Thais were killed by the Japanese." Quite a statement.
sawadee2000
December 10, 2008, 08:28

Sorry! I didn't mean to spark a "political" debate. This piece, which was written before the current PAD debacle, was meant simply as a reflection as what it's like living in Thailand while retaining a sense of my former life in America.

Yes, the remark about the French WAS a "throw away line". Colonialism has never been much fun for the "native" people of any land. Of course looking back at the past 5000 years of history, it seems that this is one theme that is played over and over again. Some guys with bigger "sticks" than their neighbors grab as much territory as they can, move their families there, and then proceed to rewrite history, Thailand certainly has seen a neighborly invader or two over the centuries. That's one reason why there is no love lost between the Thais and the Burmese and the Cambodians. And as for Thailand's cooperation with the Japanese, I would venture to guess that as in contemporary Thailand, the elite prospered and the ordinary people suffered. Am I incorrect that many died building the railway?

In any case, I would be interested in hearing about how other folks who are living here have adapted to life in Thailand. What's on YOUR list of things you miss from your corner of Farangland? I forgot to put Thanksgiving dinner on my list! I could sure go for a turkey dinner right about now.....with chestnut stuffing, mashed potatoes with gravy, homemade cranberry sauce, warm "Parker House" slathered with butter, a slice of pecan pie, all washed down with a nice bottle of Asti Spumanti. Then of course waddling over to the sofa for some football. Oh well....I guess I'll survive, but if any any multi-millionaires out there would like to Fed-Ex in dinner, I would be oh so happy!
steve rosse
December 10, 2008, 10:56

Speaking of comic book history:

"The Burmese invaded and abused and burned down the capital and STAYED AROUND for a long time. They invaded many times and always successfully." The Burmese invaded the Kingdoms of Sukhothai and Ayuthaya, which are not even geographically, let alone ethnically or culturally, synonymous with Thailand. Thailand dates itself from the Reign of Rama I, about 200 years ago. The Burmese came over the border in that time, but never successfully, and they never stayed long. That's what the Heroine's monument in Phuket celebrates.

"The Japanese treated the Thais like serfs and many Thais died or were abused." Huh? Since when? The very few Japanese soldiers stationed in Thailand treated the Thais like the Thais treat Thais, according to rank and status. They followed the code of "face." No worse and no better. Still, they never burned the capitol to the ground. America did, which is why the only buildings in Bangkok that predate 1944 are temples or palaces. Everything else was made of teak and burned. Only stone and brick remained. Read "Khu Kaam" for a portrait of the time, by a Thai who lived it.

"The Chinese have their boot on the neck of the Thais financially every single day." Gosh, this is just what Hitler said about the Jews in 1939. America is deep in debt to the Chinese, if anybody is under their boot now I'd say it's us Yanks.

"And currently in southern Thailand the Muslims have their boot on the neck of the resident Thais and successfully." The "resident" Thais in the four southernmost provinces are Muslims. The Buddhists are recent arrivals. Those provinces only became part of Thailand at the end of World War Two. Many there can still remember when they were the northernmost sultanates of Malaysia.

steve rosse
December 10, 2008, 12:27

"Am I incorrect that many died building the railway?" Yes, you are incorrect. No Thais died on the "death railway." No Thais even worked on the death railway. That was part of the deal Phibun made with the Japanese. In fact, very few Japanese worked on the death railway; most of the guards were Koreans. The Thais who had rice to sell got rich selling rice to the Japanese to feed the prisoners. They didn't sell much, because the prisoners did not eat much, but what they did sell they sold for three times what it was worth. Very, very Thai.
Union Hill
December 10, 2008, 12:32

Sawasdee 2K, Iknow where you're coming from. I have lived the expat life now for about 18 years. Because I'm a Brit, Christmas lunch is our thing. We don't really do Thanksgiving. I have always cooked up the roast turkey with all the trimmings on Christmas Day. These days, the wife's family and a few Thai friends come round and I sit there at the head of the table wearing my paper hat and watch them push their sprouts around their plates. They are always pleased when I have had enough so they can go and sit on the floor in the kitchen and pound out their somtam to enjoy with the remnants of the turkey.
steve rosse
December 10, 2008, 12:33

Do a simple Google search for "Thailand in World War Two" and you'll find endless articles like the one below, notable in that it does not mention any Japanese killing Thais.

Thailand responded pragmatically to the military and political pressures of World War II. When sporadic fighting broke out between Thai and French forces along Thailand's eastern frontier in late 1940 and early 1941, Japan used its influence with the Vichy regime in France to obtain concessions for Thailand. As a result, France agreed in March 1941 to cede 54,000 square kilometers of Laotian territory west of the Mekong and most of the Cambodian province of Battambang to Thailand. The recovery of this lost territory and the regime's apparent victory over a European colonial power greatly enhanced Phibun's reputation.

Then, on December 8, 1941, after several hours of fighting between Thai and Japanese troops at Chumphon, Thailand had to accede to Japanese demands for access through the country for Japanese forces invading Burma and Malaya. Phibun assured the country that the Japanese action was prearranged with a sympathetic Thai government. Later in the month Phibun signed a mutual defense pact with Japan. Pridi resigned from the cabinet in protest but subsequently accepted the nonpolitical position of regent for the absent Ananda Mahidol.

Under pressure from Japan, the Phibun regime declared war on Britain and the United States in January 1942, but the Thai ambassador in Washington, Seni Pramoj, refused to deliver the declaration to the United States government. Accordingly, the United States refrained from declaring war on Thailand. With American assistance Seni, a conservative aristocrat whose antiJapanese credentials were well established, organized the Free Thai Movement, recruiting Thai students in the United States to work with the United States Office of Strategic Services (OSS). The OSS trained Thai personnel for underground activities, and units were readied to infiltrate Thailand. From the office of the regent in Thailand, Pridi ran a clandestine movement that by the end of the war had with Allied aid armed more than 50,000 Thai to resist the Japanese.

Thailand was rewarded for Phibun's close cooperation with Japan during the early years of war with the return of further territory that had once been under Bangkok's control, including portions of the Shan states in Burma and the four northernmost Malay states. Japan meanwhile had stationed 150,000 troops on Thai soil and built the infamous "death railway" through Thailand using Allied prisoners of war.

As the war dragged on, however, the Japanese presence grew more irksome. Trade came to a halt, and Japanese military personnel requisitioning supplies increasingly dealt with Thailand as a conquered territory rather than as an ally. Allied bombing raids damaged Bangkok and other targets and caused several thousand casualties. Public opinion and, even more important, the sympathies of the civilian political elite, moved perceptibly against the Phibun regime and the military. In June 1944, Phibun was forced from office and replaced by the first predominantly civilian government since the 1932 coup.
Dana
December 11, 2008, 05:25

"The Burmese invaded the Kingdoms of Sukhothai and Ayuthaya, which are not even geographically, let alone ethnically or culturally, synonymous with Thailand."

The unsure will stay out of this argument. Then there is me. I would love to be a fly on the wall in Thai schools and hear what the Thai teachers tell the Thai students. I'll bet they tell the Thai students that the Burmese invaded Thailand.
steve rosse
December 11, 2008, 12:01

"I'll bet they tell the Thai students that the Burmese invaded Thailand."
The Burmese have invaded Thailand, as did the French. In neither case successfully or for very long.
RSS 2.0: Syndicate this article

Add Comment
* Name


Site



*Image Validation (?)


*Comments / Feedback





Print Article Print Article
Send to a friend Send to a friend
Save as PDF Save as PDF
Rate this Article :

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10
Poor Excellent